Extraction of Step Performed in Use Case Description as a Reference for Conformity of Sequence Diagrams Using Text Mining (Case Study: SRS APTU)

Nur Apriyanto, Y. Priyadi, D. S. Kusumo
{"title":"Extraction of Step Performed in Use Case Description as a Reference for Conformity of Sequence Diagrams Using Text Mining (Case Study: SRS APTU)","authors":"Nur Apriyanto, Y. Priyadi, D. S. Kusumo","doi":"10.1109/aiiot54504.2022.9817341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extraction is an essential part of processing a document to ensure the success of the text mining process. In this study, the example of the SRS document used is the Integrated Service Application (APTU) KPKNL Bandung, an application to manage the process of submitting service tickets at the State Property and Auction Service Office. There is a difference in interpreting the activities that exist in the Use Case Description artifact with a Sequence Diagram that provides an overview of the functionality of a process to show the involvement of an activity related to the Use Case Description. This study aims to perform step extraction on the Use Case description. The results of this extraction are compared for their suitability with the sequence diagram using the concept of text mining. There are core results from this research activity. First, the highest similarity between documents is in the SP01 and SD01 documents, with the similarity value being 0.69108792. Second, the highest similarity between words is found in words “list” and “menu,” with the similarity value being 0.9412. Third, the Kappa Score from Gwet's AC1 formula using the Python programming language is 0.12362, which means “Slight Agreement,” while the Kappa Score value using a questionnaire filled in by the expert is 0.97464, which means “Almost perfect.","PeriodicalId":409264,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/aiiot54504.2022.9817341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Extraction is an essential part of processing a document to ensure the success of the text mining process. In this study, the example of the SRS document used is the Integrated Service Application (APTU) KPKNL Bandung, an application to manage the process of submitting service tickets at the State Property and Auction Service Office. There is a difference in interpreting the activities that exist in the Use Case Description artifact with a Sequence Diagram that provides an overview of the functionality of a process to show the involvement of an activity related to the Use Case Description. This study aims to perform step extraction on the Use Case description. The results of this extraction are compared for their suitability with the sequence diagram using the concept of text mining. There are core results from this research activity. First, the highest similarity between documents is in the SP01 and SD01 documents, with the similarity value being 0.69108792. Second, the highest similarity between words is found in words “list” and “menu,” with the similarity value being 0.9412. Third, the Kappa Score from Gwet's AC1 formula using the Python programming language is 0.12362, which means “Slight Agreement,” while the Kappa Score value using a questionnaire filled in by the expert is 0.97464, which means “Almost perfect.
使用文本挖掘提取用例描述中执行的步骤作为序列图一致性的参考(案例研究:SRS APTU)
抽取是文本挖掘过程中必不可少的一部分,它保证了文本挖掘过程的成功。在本研究中,使用的SRS文档的示例是综合服务应用程序(APTU) KPKNL万隆,这是一个管理在国家财产和拍卖服务办公室提交服务票的过程的应用程序。在解释用例描述工件中存在的活动与序列图之间存在差异,序列图提供了过程功能的概述,以显示与用例描述相关的活动的参与。本研究的目的是对用例描述执行步骤提取。利用文本挖掘的概念,将该提取结果与序列图的适用性进行了比较。这项研究活动有一些核心成果。首先,文档之间的相似度最高的是SP01和SD01文档,相似度值为0.69108792。其次,单词之间的相似度最高的是“list”和“menu”,相似度值为0.9412。第三,使用Python编程语言的Gwet的AC1公式的Kappa Score是0.12362,这意味着“稍微一致”,而使用专家填写的问卷的Kappa Score值是0.97464,这意味着“几乎完美”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信