EFFECT OF USING DIFFERENT LEVELS OF CAMEL FAT (HUMP FAT) ON PHYSIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SAUSAGE FROM BEEF CAMEL AND CHICKEN

H. E. Hassan, M. Eskander, Y. H. Elhashmi, Mohammed Elhatim. I. Abdelmageed, Faiza A. Omer, Enitsar A. Ali, Moawya I. Yousif
{"title":"EFFECT OF USING DIFFERENT LEVELS OF CAMEL FAT (HUMP FAT) ON PHYSIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF SAUSAGE FROM BEEF CAMEL AND CHICKEN","authors":"H. E. Hassan, M. Eskander, Y. H. Elhashmi, Mohammed Elhatim. I. Abdelmageed, Faiza A. Omer, Enitsar A. Ali, Moawya I. Yousif","doi":"10.28936/jmracpc14.2.2022.(8)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to determine the effect of various levels of hump fat (HF) used in manufacturing of camel, beef and chicken sausage to understand the effect of (HF) on physicochemical composition sausage, Different levels of hump fat (5, 7, and 10 %) were used, physicochemical compositions like (moisture, protein, fat, Ash, water holding capacity, shrinkage, cooking loss and pH) were determined. Results of the study revealed that moisture content showed high significant differences (P≤0.01)among treatments groups, Camel sausage and beef sausage tended to have highest values while chicken sausage reported the lowest value. The study showed no significant difference (P≤0.05) among the treatment groups although 7% HF reported the highest value of moisture. Crude protein values showed no significant differences depending on sausage type, while it exhibited significant differences (P≤0.05) among the treatments groups and 7% HF reported the highest value. Ether extract values showed no significant difference (P≤0.05) among the treatments groups due to both sausage type and Hump fat level. Due to sausage types ash values showed significant differences (P≤0.05) among treatments where camel sausage samples showed the highest value while chicken sausage samples showed the lowest value. Concerning to Water Holding Capacity (W.H.C) sausage type factor reported no significant differences (P≤0.01)among treatments group. Due to hump fat levels the study showed highly significant differences (P≤0.05) among the treatment groups although 7% HF reported the highest value. On the other hands Cooking Loss, Shrinkage and pH showed no significant difference (P≤0.05) among the treatment groups in both factors types of sausage and different levels of hump fat. Hump fat in percentage 5%, 7% and 10% could be incorporate in sausage formulation and the best level of fat in sausage formulation has 7%.","PeriodicalId":365951,"journal":{"name":"iraq journal of market research and consumer protection","volume":"29 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iraq journal of market research and consumer protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28936/jmracpc14.2.2022.(8)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of various levels of hump fat (HF) used in manufacturing of camel, beef and chicken sausage to understand the effect of (HF) on physicochemical composition sausage, Different levels of hump fat (5, 7, and 10 %) were used, physicochemical compositions like (moisture, protein, fat, Ash, water holding capacity, shrinkage, cooking loss and pH) were determined. Results of the study revealed that moisture content showed high significant differences (P≤0.01)among treatments groups, Camel sausage and beef sausage tended to have highest values while chicken sausage reported the lowest value. The study showed no significant difference (P≤0.05) among the treatment groups although 7% HF reported the highest value of moisture. Crude protein values showed no significant differences depending on sausage type, while it exhibited significant differences (P≤0.05) among the treatments groups and 7% HF reported the highest value. Ether extract values showed no significant difference (P≤0.05) among the treatments groups due to both sausage type and Hump fat level. Due to sausage types ash values showed significant differences (P≤0.05) among treatments where camel sausage samples showed the highest value while chicken sausage samples showed the lowest value. Concerning to Water Holding Capacity (W.H.C) sausage type factor reported no significant differences (P≤0.01)among treatments group. Due to hump fat levels the study showed highly significant differences (P≤0.05) among the treatment groups although 7% HF reported the highest value. On the other hands Cooking Loss, Shrinkage and pH showed no significant difference (P≤0.05) among the treatment groups in both factors types of sausage and different levels of hump fat. Hump fat in percentage 5%, 7% and 10% could be incorporate in sausage formulation and the best level of fat in sausage formulation has 7%.
添加不同水平驼脂对牛肉、驼肉和鸡肉香肠理化成分的影响
为了了解驼峰脂肪对驼峰香肠、牛肉香肠和鸡肉香肠理化成分的影响,本研究采用了不同驼峰脂肪含量(5%、7%和10%),测定了驼峰脂肪的理化成分(水分、蛋白质、脂肪、灰分、持水量、收缩率、蒸煮损失和pH值)。结果表明,各处理间水分含量差异极显著(P≤0.01),驼峰肠和牛肉肠水分含量最高,鸡肉肠水分含量最低。虽然7% HF的水分值最高,但各处理组间差异无统计学意义(P≤0.05)。不同香肠类型的粗蛋白质值差异不显著,但各处理间差异显著(P≤0.05),以7% HF最高。不同香肠类型和驼峰脂肪水平的处理组间粗脂肪含量差异不显著(P≤0.05)。各处理间灰分值差异显著(P≤0.05),其中驼峰肠灰分值最高,鸡肉肠灰分值最低。肠型因子在保水性(W.H.C)方面各组间差异不显著(P≤0.01)。由于驼峰脂肪水平的差异,研究显示各治疗组间差异极显著(P≤0.05),尽管7% HF报告的值最高。蒸煮损失、收缩率和pH值在两种因素香肠类型和不同驼峰脂肪水平的处理组间差异均不显著(P≤0.05)。驼峰脂肪的添加比例分别为5%、7%和10%,以7%为最佳添加水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信