Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry

A. Bener, Andreas Jedlitschka, F. Silva, He Zhang
{"title":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","authors":"A. Bener, Andreas Jedlitschka, F. Silva, He Zhang","doi":"10.1145/3193965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CESI2017 is about \"conducting empirical studies in industrial settings\". We aim at identifying, debating about, and mitigating the barriers challenging the design and execution of empirical studies in industrial settings. In the past workshops, we also aimed at improved understanding of the emergence of industrial-strength empirical results and the critical characteristics of the research methods needed to yield those results as well as aggregating individual studies' results towards practical, evidence-based guidelines. \n \nThis year, we would like to give a special emphasis on building and managing big data systems and the use and benefit of empirical studies in this context. Big data systems bring new types of software engineering challenges such as test optimization, planning for new requirements and/or enhancements, optimization of code/algorithms, decentralization of development tasks, the role of software analytics, etc. \n \nAs of today, most of the research findings of empirical studies are isolated in papers published by specific research groups. However, it is widely accepted that replication studies are important to build a body of knowledge in empirical software engineering. They enable transfer of novel approaches and findings into different settings and contexts. We also believe that: (i) improved understanding of challenges in conducting empirical studies in industry, (ii) considering these challenges in the design of experiments, and (iii) replicating empirical studies in different settings, would lead to actionable outcomes. Thus, in the proposed workshop, we are also interested in determining the kind of follow-on actions (recommendations) that are taken upon the results of empirical studies. Such recommendations have become even more important in the era of managing big data/data-intensive systems that designing and managing such systems require empirical analysis in the field.","PeriodicalId":352943,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","volume":"58 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3193965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CESI2017 is about "conducting empirical studies in industrial settings". We aim at identifying, debating about, and mitigating the barriers challenging the design and execution of empirical studies in industrial settings. In the past workshops, we also aimed at improved understanding of the emergence of industrial-strength empirical results and the critical characteristics of the research methods needed to yield those results as well as aggregating individual studies' results towards practical, evidence-based guidelines. This year, we would like to give a special emphasis on building and managing big data systems and the use and benefit of empirical studies in this context. Big data systems bring new types of software engineering challenges such as test optimization, planning for new requirements and/or enhancements, optimization of code/algorithms, decentralization of development tasks, the role of software analytics, etc. As of today, most of the research findings of empirical studies are isolated in papers published by specific research groups. However, it is widely accepted that replication studies are important to build a body of knowledge in empirical software engineering. They enable transfer of novel approaches and findings into different settings and contexts. We also believe that: (i) improved understanding of challenges in conducting empirical studies in industry, (ii) considering these challenges in the design of experiments, and (iii) replicating empirical studies in different settings, would lead to actionable outcomes. Thus, in the proposed workshop, we are also interested in determining the kind of follow-on actions (recommendations) that are taken upon the results of empirical studies. Such recommendations have become even more important in the era of managing big data/data-intensive systems that designing and managing such systems require empirical analysis in the field.
第六届工业实证研究国际研讨会论文集
CESI2017是关于“在工业环境中进行实证研究”。我们的目标是识别、讨论和减轻在工业环境中挑战设计和执行实证研究的障碍。在过去的研讨会中,我们还旨在提高对工业实力实证结果的出现的理解,以及产生这些结果所需的研究方法的关键特征,并将个别研究的结果汇总为实用的、基于证据的指导方针。今年,我们将特别强调构建和管理大数据系统,以及在此背景下实证研究的使用和益处。大数据系统带来了新的软件工程挑战,如测试优化、新需求和/或增强的规划、代码/算法的优化、开发任务的分散、软件分析的角色等。到目前为止,大多数实证研究的研究结果都是在特定研究小组发表的论文中孤立出来的。然而,人们普遍认为,复制研究对于建立经验软件工程的知识体系是很重要的。它们能够将新的方法和发现转移到不同的环境和背景中。我们还认为:(i)提高对在工业中进行实证研究的挑战的理解,(ii)在实验设计中考虑这些挑战,以及(iii)在不同环境中复制实证研究,将导致可操作的结果。因此,在拟议的讲习班中,我们也有兴趣确定根据实证研究结果采取的后续行动(建议)的类型。在管理大数据/数据密集型系统的时代,这些建议变得更加重要,因为设计和管理这些系统需要在该领域进行实证分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信