The Promises and Realities of Evidence-Based Practices: Perceptions from Assessment Personnel.

Jessica A. Rueter, C. Simpson
{"title":"The Promises and Realities of Evidence-Based Practices: Perceptions from Assessment Personnel.","authors":"Jessica A. Rueter, C. Simpson","doi":"10.5929/2011.2.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment personnel are those individuals who work in the capacity of evaluation of students with disabilities, including, but not limited to, educational diagnosticians, educational examiners, psychometrists, and instructional specialists. These professionals are responsible for identifying strengths and weaknesses and for providing teachers with evidence-based recommendations that can be implemented in the classroom to improve performance of students with learning deficits. This qualitative study examines 19 educational diagnosticians’ perceptions related to the barriers and supports that impacted their ability to provide evidence-based recommendations for students who are learning disabled. Three categories of barriers to issuing successful evidence-based recommendations emerged as a result of the study: Knowledge of EvidenceBased Interventions, Time to Complete Assessments, and Support from Administrators and Teachers.","PeriodicalId":189332,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Issues Journal","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Issues Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5929/2011.2.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Assessment personnel are those individuals who work in the capacity of evaluation of students with disabilities, including, but not limited to, educational diagnosticians, educational examiners, psychometrists, and instructional specialists. These professionals are responsible for identifying strengths and weaknesses and for providing teachers with evidence-based recommendations that can be implemented in the classroom to improve performance of students with learning deficits. This qualitative study examines 19 educational diagnosticians’ perceptions related to the barriers and supports that impacted their ability to provide evidence-based recommendations for students who are learning disabled. Three categories of barriers to issuing successful evidence-based recommendations emerged as a result of the study: Knowledge of EvidenceBased Interventions, Time to Complete Assessments, and Support from Administrators and Teachers.
基于证据的实践的承诺和现实:来自评估人员的感知。
评估人员是那些以评估残疾学生的能力工作的个人,包括但不限于教育诊断学家、教育考官、心理测量学家和教学专家。这些专业人员负责确定优势和劣势,并为教师提供基于证据的建议,这些建议可以在课堂上实施,以改善有学习缺陷的学生的表现。本定性研究考察了19名教育诊断医生对障碍和支持的看法,这些障碍和支持影响了他们为学习障碍学生提供循证建议的能力。研究结果显示,发布成功的基于证据的建议存在三类障碍:基于证据的干预措施的知识、完成评估的时间以及来自管理人员和教师的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信