노예제에 대한 침묵: 패트리샤 로제마의 『맨스필드 파크』

Jung Suk Hwang
{"title":"노예제에 대한 침묵: 패트리샤 로제마의 『맨스필드 파크』","authors":"Jung Suk Hwang","doi":"10.19116/theory.2022.27.3.333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adapting Jane Austen’s 1814 novel to film, Mansfield Park (1999), Patricia Rozema transforms Austen’s Fanny Price into an active, witty, and rebellious heroine and centralizes the theme of slavery. The film’s fidelity has been earnestly debated, but Rozema claims that her film is faithful to the original source. As she points out, the seemingly incongruent link—between Austen and slavery—is not new. Austen’s Mansfield Park has been widely examined regarding the issue of slavery and Fanny has been commonly read as a character who represents the Other, women and slaves. These readings, however, reveal an uneasy relationship between feminism and post- colonialism by conceptualizing white women as a homogenous group of the powerless and oppressed. The relationship becomes more problematic when they readily equate Fanny with the non-white exploited racial Other, the slaves in Antigua. Analyzing the limitations of Austen’s representation of slavery, I examine how Rozema not only faithfully reproduces the limitations but also silences the Black Other—the slaves in Antigua—who only appear in Tom’s sketches of Antiguan slaves and sculptures of Black servants at Mansfield Park.","PeriodicalId":409687,"journal":{"name":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2022.27.3.333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adapting Jane Austen’s 1814 novel to film, Mansfield Park (1999), Patricia Rozema transforms Austen’s Fanny Price into an active, witty, and rebellious heroine and centralizes the theme of slavery. The film’s fidelity has been earnestly debated, but Rozema claims that her film is faithful to the original source. As she points out, the seemingly incongruent link—between Austen and slavery—is not new. Austen’s Mansfield Park has been widely examined regarding the issue of slavery and Fanny has been commonly read as a character who represents the Other, women and slaves. These readings, however, reveal an uneasy relationship between feminism and post- colonialism by conceptualizing white women as a homogenous group of the powerless and oppressed. The relationship becomes more problematic when they readily equate Fanny with the non-white exploited racial Other, the slaves in Antigua. Analyzing the limitations of Austen’s representation of slavery, I examine how Rozema not only faithfully reproduces the limitations but also silences the Black Other—the slaves in Antigua—who only appear in Tom’s sketches of Antiguan slaves and sculptures of Black servants at Mansfield Park.
对奴隶制的沉默:帕特里夏·罗塞马的《曼斯菲尔德公园》
改编自简·奥斯汀1814年的小说《曼斯菲尔德庄园》(1999),帕特丽夏·罗兹马将奥斯汀笔下的范妮·普莱斯塑造成一个活跃、机智、叛逆的女主人公,并将奴隶制的主题集中在一起。这部电影的忠实度一直备受争议,但罗兹马声称她的电影忠实于原始来源。正如她所指出的,奥斯汀和奴隶制之间看似不一致的联系并不新鲜。奥斯丁的《曼斯菲尔德庄园》在奴隶制问题上受到了广泛的审视,而范妮通常被解读为一个代表他者、妇女和奴隶的角色。然而,这些解读揭示了女权主义和后殖民主义之间的一种不安的关系,将白人女性概念化为无力和受压迫者的同质群体。当他们把范妮等同于非白人被剥削的其他种族,即安提瓜的奴隶时,这种关系变得更有问题了。分析奥斯丁对奴隶制表现的局限性,我研究了罗泽马如何不仅忠实地再现了这些局限性,而且使黑人他者——安提瓜的奴隶——沉默,他们只出现在汤姆对安提瓜奴隶的素描和曼斯菲尔德公园黑人仆人的雕塑中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信