PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBATASAN DARAT DI SEGMEN BIDJAEL SUNAN OBEN ANTARA INDONESIA DAN TIMOR LESTE

Nadia Sabrilla
{"title":"PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBATASAN DARAT DI SEGMEN BIDJAEL SUNAN OBEN ANTARA INDONESIA DAN TIMOR LESTE","authors":"Nadia Sabrilla","doi":"10.23887/glr.v4i1.1500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to look into how land border disputes between Indonesia and Timor Leste along the Sunan-Oben Bidjael Segment have been settled using international law. An official editor is employed in this normative study. The study’s findings demonstrate that a Joint Border Committee between Timor Leste and Indonesia has been established to serve as a forum for settling land border disputes. Later, This team then changed its name to The Treaty of 1904 and the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 1914 (PCA 1914) have been chosen by the Technical Sub-Committee on Boundary Demarcation and Regulation (TSC-BDR) as the border demarcation legal framework. Article 8 of the 2005 Provisional Agreement states that local communities, in this case indigenous peoples and traditional leaders at the borders, are given the opportunity to participate in the dispute resolution procedure that takes place on the border between the two countries by promoting nonviolent and peaceful means. (b). It is evident that the systems of customary law that apply to the residents of East Timor (Timor Leste) and West Timor (Indonesia) are the same given that these two communities share a shared sociocultural background. Land conflicts, the boundaries of a community’s territory, and the ability of community leaders to engage in direct discussions to resolve these issues can all be governed by the basic principles of customary law.","PeriodicalId":399663,"journal":{"name":"Ganesha Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ganesha Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v4i1.1500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to look into how land border disputes between Indonesia and Timor Leste along the Sunan-Oben Bidjael Segment have been settled using international law. An official editor is employed in this normative study. The study’s findings demonstrate that a Joint Border Committee between Timor Leste and Indonesia has been established to serve as a forum for settling land border disputes. Later, This team then changed its name to The Treaty of 1904 and the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 1914 (PCA 1914) have been chosen by the Technical Sub-Committee on Boundary Demarcation and Regulation (TSC-BDR) as the border demarcation legal framework. Article 8 of the 2005 Provisional Agreement states that local communities, in this case indigenous peoples and traditional leaders at the borders, are given the opportunity to participate in the dispute resolution procedure that takes place on the border between the two countries by promoting nonviolent and peaceful means. (b). It is evident that the systems of customary law that apply to the residents of East Timor (Timor Leste) and West Timor (Indonesia) are the same given that these two communities share a shared sociocultural background. Land conflicts, the boundaries of a community’s territory, and the ability of community leaders to engage in direct discussions to resolve these issues can all be governed by the basic principles of customary law.
本研究旨在探讨如何利用国际法解决印度尼西亚和东帝汶之间沿苏南-奥本比贾尔段的陆地边界争端。在这项规范研究中,我们聘请了一位官方编辑。这项研究的结果表明,东帝汶和印度尼西亚之间成立了一个联合边界委员会,作为解决陆地边界争端的论坛。后来,该小组又将其名称改为《1904年条约》和《1914年常设仲裁法院》(PCA 1914),由边界勘界和规则技术小组委员会(TSC-BDR)选择作为边界勘界的法律框架。2005年临时协议第8条规定,当地社区,在这种情况下是边界的土著人民和传统领导人,有机会通过促进非暴力与和平手段参与两国边界发生的争端解决程序。(b).显然,适用于东帝汶(东帝汶)和西帝汶(印度尼西亚)居民的习惯法制度是相同的,因为这两个社区有着共同的社会文化背景。土地冲突、社区领土的边界以及社区领导人参与直接讨论以解决这些问题的能力都可以由习惯法的基本原则支配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信