Quantal aspects of scientific information

D. Mackay
{"title":"Quantal aspects of scientific information","authors":"D. Mackay","doi":"10.1109/TIT.1953.1188569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an attempt to clarify some aspects of the approach to experimentation suggested by the author in a recent publication in the Philosophical Magazine, (hereafter referred to as P.M.). The concept of \"amount of information\" is shown to have three distinct senses in current literature. Two of these are definable as numerical features of the logical pattern of propositional relations which we make to represent a result. The third measures the relative unexpectedness of the pattern, which may or may not be connected with its numerical features. Since logical patterns can be built up from discrete quantal elements, the information enabling them to be built is quantised by our use of 'yes-or-no' logical forms as scientific statements. The number of discrete 'elementary propositions' in a given description cannot be altered by any complete reformulation. This is seen to be the basis of our ability to 'barter' certain quantities for one another - e.g. accuracy for speed of response in a galvanometer or a communication-channel. The term \"selective information\" is suggested to distinguish the third sense of 'information' (called amount of detail in P.M.) from the first two, whioh measure respectively the number of independent features (structural information) and the weight of evidence or precision (metrical information) in a result. 'Selective information' is the measure of information currently used by communication engineers, and a distinguishing title appears to be essential. From the standpoint here adopted the various uncertainty-relations of physics illustrate a general axiom expressing the quantal nature of the logical descriptions which we make. Some other practical and theoretical implications of the theory are examined.","PeriodicalId":134468,"journal":{"name":"Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1953-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1953.1188569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to clarify some aspects of the approach to experimentation suggested by the author in a recent publication in the Philosophical Magazine, (hereafter referred to as P.M.). The concept of "amount of information" is shown to have three distinct senses in current literature. Two of these are definable as numerical features of the logical pattern of propositional relations which we make to represent a result. The third measures the relative unexpectedness of the pattern, which may or may not be connected with its numerical features. Since logical patterns can be built up from discrete quantal elements, the information enabling them to be built is quantised by our use of 'yes-or-no' logical forms as scientific statements. The number of discrete 'elementary propositions' in a given description cannot be altered by any complete reformulation. This is seen to be the basis of our ability to 'barter' certain quantities for one another - e.g. accuracy for speed of response in a galvanometer or a communication-channel. The term "selective information" is suggested to distinguish the third sense of 'information' (called amount of detail in P.M.) from the first two, whioh measure respectively the number of independent features (structural information) and the weight of evidence or precision (metrical information) in a result. 'Selective information' is the measure of information currently used by communication engineers, and a distinguishing title appears to be essential. From the standpoint here adopted the various uncertainty-relations of physics illustrate a general axiom expressing the quantal nature of the logical descriptions which we make. Some other practical and theoretical implications of the theory are examined.
科学信息的量子方面
本文试图澄清作者在《哲学杂志》(以下简称《哲学杂志》)最近发表的一篇文章中提出的实验方法的某些方面。在目前的文献中,“信息量”的概念有三种不同的含义。其中两个可以定义为我们用来表示结果的命题关系逻辑模式的数值特征。第三种测量模式的相对不可预测性,这可能与它的数字特征有关,也可能与之无关。由于逻辑模式可以从离散的量子元素中建立起来,因此通过我们使用“是或否”的逻辑形式作为科学陈述,可以将构建逻辑模式的信息量子化。在一个给定的描述中离散的“基本命题”的数目不能被任何完全的重新表述所改变。这被认为是我们相互交换某些数量的能力的基础,例如,在振镜或通信通道中,响应速度的准确性。建议使用“选择性信息”一词来区分第三种“信息”(在P.M.中称为细节量)和前两种“信息”,这两种“信息”分别衡量结果中独立特征的数量(结构信息)和证据或精度的权重(度量信息)。“选择性信息”是通信工程师目前使用的信息衡量标准,一个有区别的标题似乎是必不可少的。从这里所采用的观点出发,物理学的各种不确定性关系说明了一个普遍的公理,它表示我们所作的逻辑描述的量子化性质。对该理论的其他一些实践和理论含义进行了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信