Finding the Right Concept Via a Decision Quality Framework with Rapid Generation of Multiple Deepwater Conceptual Alternatives

Y. Zeng, S. Ryu, C. Chaney, A. Hill, W. Sun, B. Keinath, C. E. Osuji, D. Sistiva, S. Ford, H. Stripling, L. Garza-Rios, S. Kim, B. Ruskin, L. Basilio, P. B. Machado, R. Castro, J. Bickel
{"title":"Finding the Right Concept Via a Decision Quality Framework with Rapid Generation of Multiple Deepwater Conceptual Alternatives","authors":"Y. Zeng, S. Ryu, C. Chaney, A. Hill, W. Sun, B. Keinath, C. E. Osuji, D. Sistiva, S. Ford, H. Stripling, L. Garza-Rios, S. Kim, B. Ruskin, L. Basilio, P. B. Machado, R. Castro, J. Bickel","doi":"10.2118/210288-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The key to finding the highest-value concept in deepwater full-field development is by making high-quality decisions during the Concept Select stage of a project. One of the critical elements to achieve this is by considering a broad range of conceptual alternatives and evaluating them rapidly, providing timely feedback, and facilitating an exploratory learning process. However, concept-select decisions are challenged by competing objectives, significant uncertainties, and many possible concepts. Further, deepwater full-field developments require strong connectivity and interfaces across multiple disciplines, which include reservoir, wells, drilling, flow assurance, subsea, flowlines, risers, topsides, metocean, geotechnical, marine, costing, and project economics.\n Key challenges to the current methodology include a lack of capacity to consider multiple concepts, slow evaluation turn-around for each concept generated, continuous evaluation and revisions with new data and information, lack of ability to integrate processes across multiple disciplines, and poor risk management driven by technical/commercial uncertainties and unavailable data. This paper addresses these challenges by combining concepts from the Decision Quality (DQ) framework and FLOCO® (Field Layout Concept Optimizer), which is a metaheuristic model-based system-engineering software, to efficiently identify the highest value field development concepts among several possible alternatives.\n This novel approach applies a new framework to an offshore deepwater full-field development. Specifically, we explore the trade-space, evaluate the trade-offs between risk and reward, perform integrated techno-economic analysis, and identify the best concepts. Key outputs are the identification of development concepts that meet the given constraints and functional requirements for further optimization, while eliminating those that do not meet such requirements.\n The results demonstrate that the challenges in the current Concept Select phase can be simplified and that the proposed approach offers a quick, logical, and insightful means of selecting the highest-value concept. The case study demonstrates that the proposed improvement to the concept-select stage of deepwater full-field development process can lead to significantly improved project economics, as it fully explores the decision-space, key uncertainties, multiple technically feasible concepts, and key performance indicators such as net present value (NPV) and capital expenditures (CAPEX).\n This paper addresses the development of economic oil and gas projects through decision making enhanced by rapid digital prototyping and analysis. The integration of Decision Quality methodologies with systems-engineering decision-support tools is novel and is likely to become more important as the industry explores and develops more complicated targets in the future.","PeriodicalId":223474,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, October 03, 2022","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, October 03, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210288-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The key to finding the highest-value concept in deepwater full-field development is by making high-quality decisions during the Concept Select stage of a project. One of the critical elements to achieve this is by considering a broad range of conceptual alternatives and evaluating them rapidly, providing timely feedback, and facilitating an exploratory learning process. However, concept-select decisions are challenged by competing objectives, significant uncertainties, and many possible concepts. Further, deepwater full-field developments require strong connectivity and interfaces across multiple disciplines, which include reservoir, wells, drilling, flow assurance, subsea, flowlines, risers, topsides, metocean, geotechnical, marine, costing, and project economics. Key challenges to the current methodology include a lack of capacity to consider multiple concepts, slow evaluation turn-around for each concept generated, continuous evaluation and revisions with new data and information, lack of ability to integrate processes across multiple disciplines, and poor risk management driven by technical/commercial uncertainties and unavailable data. This paper addresses these challenges by combining concepts from the Decision Quality (DQ) framework and FLOCO® (Field Layout Concept Optimizer), which is a metaheuristic model-based system-engineering software, to efficiently identify the highest value field development concepts among several possible alternatives. This novel approach applies a new framework to an offshore deepwater full-field development. Specifically, we explore the trade-space, evaluate the trade-offs between risk and reward, perform integrated techno-economic analysis, and identify the best concepts. Key outputs are the identification of development concepts that meet the given constraints and functional requirements for further optimization, while eliminating those that do not meet such requirements. The results demonstrate that the challenges in the current Concept Select phase can be simplified and that the proposed approach offers a quick, logical, and insightful means of selecting the highest-value concept. The case study demonstrates that the proposed improvement to the concept-select stage of deepwater full-field development process can lead to significantly improved project economics, as it fully explores the decision-space, key uncertainties, multiple technically feasible concepts, and key performance indicators such as net present value (NPV) and capital expenditures (CAPEX). This paper addresses the development of economic oil and gas projects through decision making enhanced by rapid digital prototyping and analysis. The integration of Decision Quality methodologies with systems-engineering decision-support tools is novel and is likely to become more important as the industry explores and develops more complicated targets in the future.
通过快速生成多个深水概念替代方案的决策质量框架找到正确的概念
在深水全油田开发中,找到价值最高的概念的关键是在项目的概念选择阶段做出高质量的决策。实现这一目标的关键因素之一是考虑广泛的概念替代方案,并迅速评估它们,提供及时的反馈,并促进探索性学习过程。然而,概念选择决策受到竞争目标、重大不确定性和许多可能的概念的挑战。此外,深水全油田开发需要跨多个学科的强大连通性和接口,包括油藏、井、钻井、流动保障、海底、管线、立管、上层平台、海洋、岩土、海洋、成本和项目经济。当前方法面临的主要挑战包括缺乏考虑多个概念的能力,每个概念的评估周期缓慢,使用新数据和信息进行持续评估和修订,缺乏跨多个学科整合流程的能力,以及由技术/商业不确定性和不可用数据驱动的不良风险管理。本文通过结合决策质量(DQ)框架和基于元启发式模型的系统工程软件FLOCO®(油田布局概念优化器)的概念来解决这些挑战,以便在几种可能的替代方案中有效地识别最高价值的油田开发概念。这种新方法为海上深水全油田开发提供了新的框架。具体而言,我们探索了贸易空间,评估了风险与回报之间的权衡,进行了综合技术经济分析,并确定了最佳概念。关键的产出是确定符合进一步优化的既定限制和功能要求的发展概念,同时消除不符合这些要求的发展概念。结果表明,当前概念选择阶段的挑战可以简化,并且所提出的方法提供了一种快速,合乎逻辑且富有洞察力的选择最高价值概念的方法。案例研究表明,对深水全油田开发过程概念选择阶段的改进可以显著提高项目经济性,因为它充分探索了决策空间、关键不确定性、多种技术上可行的概念以及净现值(NPV)和资本支出(CAPEX)等关键绩效指标。本文通过快速数字原型和分析增强的决策来解决经济石油和天然气项目的发展。决策质量方法与系统工程决策支持工具的集成是新颖的,并且随着行业在未来探索和开发更复杂的目标,可能会变得更加重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信