Experimental and Computational Investigation of Film Cooling Performance and External Flowfield Effects due to Impingement Coolant Feed in the Leading Edge of a Turbine Blade

J. Moore, Christopher C. Easterby, D. Bogard
{"title":"Experimental and Computational Investigation of Film Cooling Performance and External Flowfield Effects due to Impingement Coolant Feed in the Leading Edge of a Turbine Blade","authors":"J. Moore, Christopher C. Easterby, D. Bogard","doi":"10.1115/gt2021-60015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The effects that leading-edge impingement coolant feeds have on the external flowfield and on film cooling performance in the showerhead have not been studied thoroughly in the literature. To isolate the influence of the impingement feed, experimental adiabatic effectiveness and off-the-wall thermal field measurements were made using a shaped hole geometry fed by an ideal plenum coolant feed and by an engine-realistic impingement coolant feed. The impingement configuration exhibited around 10% higher adiabatic effectiveness levels than the plenum configuration did — a finding in agreement with the few studies isolating this effect. CFD RANS simulations of the impingement and the pseudo-plenum configurations from a companion study were consulted to investigate the root cause of this difference in performance because the experimental data alone did not sufficiently explain it. In the impingement feed simulation, flow remained better attached throughout the hole (both at the inlet and at the diffuser) due to a rotation caused by the impingement flow, leading to better attachment on the exterior surface. This was most significant for the suction side holes at higher blowing ratios wherein the pseudo-plenum caused much more severe separation in the holes than the impingement configuration did.","PeriodicalId":204099,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5A: Heat Transfer — Combustors; Film Cooling","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5A: Heat Transfer — Combustors; Film Cooling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-60015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects that leading-edge impingement coolant feeds have on the external flowfield and on film cooling performance in the showerhead have not been studied thoroughly in the literature. To isolate the influence of the impingement feed, experimental adiabatic effectiveness and off-the-wall thermal field measurements were made using a shaped hole geometry fed by an ideal plenum coolant feed and by an engine-realistic impingement coolant feed. The impingement configuration exhibited around 10% higher adiabatic effectiveness levels than the plenum configuration did — a finding in agreement with the few studies isolating this effect. CFD RANS simulations of the impingement and the pseudo-plenum configurations from a companion study were consulted to investigate the root cause of this difference in performance because the experimental data alone did not sufficiently explain it. In the impingement feed simulation, flow remained better attached throughout the hole (both at the inlet and at the diffuser) due to a rotation caused by the impingement flow, leading to better attachment on the exterior surface. This was most significant for the suction side holes at higher blowing ratios wherein the pseudo-plenum caused much more severe separation in the holes than the impingement configuration did.
涡轮叶片前缘冲击冷却液对气膜冷却性能及外部流场影响的实验与计算研究
前缘冲击冷却剂进给量对淋喷头外流场和膜状冷却性能的影响,文献研究尚不深入。为了隔离冲击进给量的影响,研究人员使用理想充气冷却剂进给量和发动机实际冲击冷却剂进给量进行了实验绝热效率和壁外热场测量。撞击式结构的绝热效能水平比充气式结构高10%左右,这一发现与为数不多的孤立这种效应的研究结果一致。为了探究这种性能差异的根本原因,研究人员参考了来自一项配套研究的碰撞和伪静压室配置的CFD RANS模拟,因为单独的实验数据并不能充分解释这种差异。在冲击进料模拟中,由于冲击流引起的旋转,流动在整个孔中(包括入口和扩压器处)保持了更好的附着,从而导致了更好的外表面附着。这在高吹气比的吸力侧孔中最为显著,其中假静压室比撞击配置造成的孔中分离严重得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信