Recognition or Non-Recognition of Foreign Civil Marriages in Israel

Yitshak Cohen
{"title":"Recognition or Non-Recognition of Foreign Civil Marriages in Israel","authors":"Yitshak Cohen","doi":"10.9785/9783504385637-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The State of Israel determined by legislation that matters of personal status including marriage and divorce are subject to personal law, namely religious law. Since the applicable law is personal and not territorial, it varies from person to person and is not uniform as under civil law. This simply means that Israel has no separation of religion and state in matters of divorce and marriage. Religion is the only determining factor in these matters. Thus, marriages prohibited by religious law do not take place in Israel. This is true of all four major religions in Israel: Christianity, Islam, the Druze religion, and Judaism. The discussion under Israeli law should have ended here with regard to civil marriage performed in a foreign country, especially marriage prohibited by Jewish law such as marriage between spouses only one of whom is Jewish, or marriage of a same-sex couple. Prohibited marriage has no place in a state in which religious law prevails in matters of status. \nHowever, the Israeli courts, unlike the legislature, have more of a civil orientation than a religious one. They look for ways to bridge the gap between religious law and the rules of private international law that seek to recognize or respect civil legal actions carried out in a foreign country. In some cases, the courts have recognized the status of civil marriages even where such marriages are prohibited by state law. In order to avoid the serious conflict between religious law and the domestic rules of private international law, the court has explained that this is not a matter of personal status but rather an administrative question which purely concerns the Population Registry. For example, same-sex couples can today be registered as married couples in the Population Registry if they were married in a civil ceremony in a foreign country. \nThe decisions made in these matters are greatly disputed and reflect the constant prevailing tensions regarding Israel not only as a Jewish state (characterized by religious law), but also as a democratic state (characterized, among other factors, by recognition of the rules of private international law). Although the Basic Laws stipulate that Israel is both, in practice these values conflict and often collide. This tension is clearly reflected in, and may be analyzed through, the issue of civil marriages performed in a foreign country and prohibited by religious law in Israel.","PeriodicalId":284503,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of Private International Law Vol. XVIII - 2016/2017","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of Private International Law Vol. XVIII - 2016/2017","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504385637-015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The State of Israel determined by legislation that matters of personal status including marriage and divorce are subject to personal law, namely religious law. Since the applicable law is personal and not territorial, it varies from person to person and is not uniform as under civil law. This simply means that Israel has no separation of religion and state in matters of divorce and marriage. Religion is the only determining factor in these matters. Thus, marriages prohibited by religious law do not take place in Israel. This is true of all four major religions in Israel: Christianity, Islam, the Druze religion, and Judaism. The discussion under Israeli law should have ended here with regard to civil marriage performed in a foreign country, especially marriage prohibited by Jewish law such as marriage between spouses only one of whom is Jewish, or marriage of a same-sex couple. Prohibited marriage has no place in a state in which religious law prevails in matters of status. However, the Israeli courts, unlike the legislature, have more of a civil orientation than a religious one. They look for ways to bridge the gap between religious law and the rules of private international law that seek to recognize or respect civil legal actions carried out in a foreign country. In some cases, the courts have recognized the status of civil marriages even where such marriages are prohibited by state law. In order to avoid the serious conflict between religious law and the domestic rules of private international law, the court has explained that this is not a matter of personal status but rather an administrative question which purely concerns the Population Registry. For example, same-sex couples can today be registered as married couples in the Population Registry if they were married in a civil ceremony in a foreign country. The decisions made in these matters are greatly disputed and reflect the constant prevailing tensions regarding Israel not only as a Jewish state (characterized by religious law), but also as a democratic state (characterized, among other factors, by recognition of the rules of private international law). Although the Basic Laws stipulate that Israel is both, in practice these values conflict and often collide. This tension is clearly reflected in, and may be analyzed through, the issue of civil marriages performed in a foreign country and prohibited by religious law in Israel.
以色列承认或不承认外国民事婚姻
以色列国通过立法确定,包括结婚和离婚在内的个人地位问题受属人法,即宗教法的管辖。由于适用的法律是个人法而非地域性法,因此它因人而异,不像民法那样统一。这仅仅意味着以色列在离婚和结婚问题上没有宗教和国家的分离。宗教是这些事情的唯一决定因素。因此,宗教法律禁止的婚姻不能在以色列举行。以色列的四大宗教都是如此:基督教、伊斯兰教、德鲁兹教和犹太教。关于在外国举行的民事婚姻,特别是犹太法律所禁止的婚姻,例如只有一方是犹太人的配偶之间的婚姻,或同性伴侣的婚姻,根据以色列法律的讨论应该到此为止。在一个宗教法在地位问题上占上风的国家,禁止婚姻是没有立足之地的。然而,与立法机关不同的是,以色列法院更倾向于民事而非宗教。他们寻找办法弥合宗教法与寻求承认或尊重在外国进行的民事法律行动的国际私法规则之间的差距。在某些情况下,法院承认民事婚姻的地位,即使这种婚姻是被州法律禁止的。为了避免宗教法和国际私法的国内规则之间的严重冲突,法院解释说,这不是一个个人地位的问题,而是一个纯粹涉及人口登记处的行政问题。例如,同性伴侣今天可以在人口登记处登记为已婚夫妇,如果他们在外国举行了民事仪式。在这些问题上作出的决定有很大争议,反映了以色列不仅作为一个犹太国家(以宗教法为特征),而且作为一个民主国家(除其他因素外,以承认国际私法规则为特征)的持续普遍的紧张局势。尽管《基本法》规定以色列是两者兼而有之,但在实践中,这些价值观相互冲突,经常发生冲突。这种紧张关系清楚地反映在以色列宗教法所禁止的在外国举行的民事婚姻问题上,并可以通过这一问题加以分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信