Comparison of Spelling Error Correction Algorithms for the Indonesian Language

Yanfi Yanfi, Reina Setiawan, Haryono Soeparno, W. Budiharto
{"title":"Comparison of Spelling Error Correction Algorithms for the Indonesian Language","authors":"Yanfi Yanfi, Reina Setiawan, Haryono Soeparno, W. Budiharto","doi":"10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Edit distance as a string measurement metric is often used to help detect misspellings in languages. This paper aims to compare two string spelling error correction algorithms for the Indonesian language. The N-gram, Jaro-Winkler distance, and Levenshtein distance algorithms are used to determine whether they can accurately correct typological errors in the Indonesian language. Moreover, this study utilized KNIME tools to process the data from beginning to end. The data was retrieved from news in Indonesia. After the experiment on N from 1 to 12, the results obtained for the comparative analysis proved that Jaro-Winkler distance performed better than Levenshtein distance for comparing smaller strings like words and names. However, Levenshtein distance performs as well as Jaro-Winkler distance started from four strings. Finally, both Jaro-Winkler distance and Levenshtein distance algorithm got the best performance accuracy for eight strings with an accuracy of 99.52 percent. The result of this study is also presented that both algorithms can support word error correction for the Indonesian language.","PeriodicalId":332586,"journal":{"name":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Edit distance as a string measurement metric is often used to help detect misspellings in languages. This paper aims to compare two string spelling error correction algorithms for the Indonesian language. The N-gram, Jaro-Winkler distance, and Levenshtein distance algorithms are used to determine whether they can accurately correct typological errors in the Indonesian language. Moreover, this study utilized KNIME tools to process the data from beginning to end. The data was retrieved from news in Indonesia. After the experiment on N from 1 to 12, the results obtained for the comparative analysis proved that Jaro-Winkler distance performed better than Levenshtein distance for comparing smaller strings like words and names. However, Levenshtein distance performs as well as Jaro-Winkler distance started from four strings. Finally, both Jaro-Winkler distance and Levenshtein distance algorithm got the best performance accuracy for eight strings with an accuracy of 99.52 percent. The result of this study is also presented that both algorithms can support word error correction for the Indonesian language.
印尼语拼写纠错算法的比较
编辑距离作为一种字符串度量度量,经常用于帮助检测语言中的拼写错误。本文旨在比较印尼语的两种字符串拼写纠错算法。使用N-gram、Jaro-Winkler距离和Levenshtein距离算法来确定它们是否能准确地纠正印尼语中的类型学错误。此外,本研究使用KNIME工具对数据进行从头到尾的处理。数据来源于印度尼西亚的新闻。在N为1 ~ 12的条件下进行实验,对比分析得到的结果证明,在比较单词、名称等较小的字符串时,Jaro-Winkler距离优于Levenshtein距离。然而,Levenshtein距离的表现与Jaro-Winkler距离一样好。最后,Jaro-Winkler距离算法和Levenshtein距离算法在8个字符串上都获得了最好的性能精度,准确率为99.52%。研究结果还显示,这两种算法都能支持印尼语的单词纠错。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信