The role of data sharing in survey dropout: a study among scientists as respondents

Urs A. Fichtner, L. M. Horstmeier, B. Brühmann, Manuel Watter, Harald Binder, J. Knaus
{"title":"The role of data sharing in survey dropout: a study among scientists as respondents","authors":"Urs A. Fichtner, L. M. Horstmeier, B. Brühmann, Manuel Watter, Harald Binder, J. Knaus","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2022-0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeOne of the currently debated changes in scientific practice is the implementation of data sharing requirements for peer-reviewed publication to increase transparency and intersubjective verifiability of results. However, it seems that data sharing is a not fully adopted behavior among researchers. The theory of planned behavior was repeatedly applied to explain drivers of data sharing from the perspective of data donors (researchers). However, data sharing can be viewed from another perspective as well: survey participants. The research questions (RQs) for this study were as follows: 1 Does data sharing increase participant's nonresponse? 2 Does data sharing influence participant's response behavior? The purpose of this paper is to address these issues.Design/methodology/approachTo answer the RQs, a mixed methods approach was applied, consisting of a qualitative prestudy and a quantitative survey including an experimental component. The latter was a two-group setup with an intervention group (A) and a control group (B). A list-based recruiting of members of the Medical Faculty of the University of Freiburg was applied for 15 days. For exploratory data analysis of dropouts and nonresponse, we used Fisher's exact tests and binary logistic regressions.FindingsIn sum, we recorded 197 cases for Group A and 198 cases for Group B. We found no systematic group differences regarding response bias or dropout. Furthermore, we gained insights into the experiences our sample made with data sharing: half of our sample already requested data of other researchers or shared data on request of other researchers. Data repositories, however, were used less frequently: 28% of our respondents used data from repositories and 19% stored data in a repository.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, their study is the first study that includes researchers as survey subjects investigating the effect of data sharing on their response patterns.","PeriodicalId":402385,"journal":{"name":"J. Documentation","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2022-0135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeOne of the currently debated changes in scientific practice is the implementation of data sharing requirements for peer-reviewed publication to increase transparency and intersubjective verifiability of results. However, it seems that data sharing is a not fully adopted behavior among researchers. The theory of planned behavior was repeatedly applied to explain drivers of data sharing from the perspective of data donors (researchers). However, data sharing can be viewed from another perspective as well: survey participants. The research questions (RQs) for this study were as follows: 1 Does data sharing increase participant's nonresponse? 2 Does data sharing influence participant's response behavior? The purpose of this paper is to address these issues.Design/methodology/approachTo answer the RQs, a mixed methods approach was applied, consisting of a qualitative prestudy and a quantitative survey including an experimental component. The latter was a two-group setup with an intervention group (A) and a control group (B). A list-based recruiting of members of the Medical Faculty of the University of Freiburg was applied for 15 days. For exploratory data analysis of dropouts and nonresponse, we used Fisher's exact tests and binary logistic regressions.FindingsIn sum, we recorded 197 cases for Group A and 198 cases for Group B. We found no systematic group differences regarding response bias or dropout. Furthermore, we gained insights into the experiences our sample made with data sharing: half of our sample already requested data of other researchers or shared data on request of other researchers. Data repositories, however, were used less frequently: 28% of our respondents used data from repositories and 19% stored data in a repository.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, their study is the first study that includes researchers as survey subjects investigating the effect of data sharing on their response patterns.
数据共享在调查退出中的作用:一项以科学家为调查对象的研究
目的目前科学实践中有争议的变化之一是实施同行评审出版物的数据共享要求,以提高结果的透明度和主体间可验证性。然而,数据共享似乎并不是研究人员完全采用的行为。计划行为理论被反复应用于从数据提供者(研究者)的角度解释数据共享的驱动因素。然而,数据共享也可以从另一个角度来看待:调查参与者。本研究的研究问题(RQs)如下:1数据共享是否会增加参与者的不回应?数据共享是否影响参与者的反应行为?本文的目的就是要解决这些问题。设计/方法/方法为了回答rq,采用了混合方法,包括定性预研究和包括实验成分的定量调查。后者是两组设置,干预组(a)和对照组(B)。以名单为基础招募弗赖堡大学医学院成员,为期15天。对于辍学和无反应的探索性数据分析,我们使用Fisher精确检验和二元逻辑回归。总的来说,我们记录了A组197例和b组198例。我们发现在反应偏倚或退出方面没有系统的组间差异。此外,我们还深入了解了我们的样本在数据共享方面的经验:一半的样本已经要求其他研究人员提供数据,或者应其他研究人员的要求共享数据。然而,数据存储库的使用频率较低:28%的受访者使用存储库中的数据,19%的受访者将数据存储在存储库中。原创性/价值据作者所知,他们的研究是第一个将研究人员作为调查对象来调查数据共享对其反应模式的影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信