Four Fundamental Questions in Probability Theory and Statistics

P. Rocchi
{"title":"Four Fundamental Questions in Probability Theory and Statistics","authors":"P. Rocchi","doi":"10.4006/0836-1398-30.3.314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study has the purpose of addressing four questions that lie at the base of the probability theory and statistics, and includes two main steps. As first, we conduct the textual analysis of the most significant works written by eminent probability theorists. The textual analysis turns out to be a rather innovative method of study in this domain, and shows how the sampled writers, no matter he is a frequentist or a subjectivist, share a similar approach. Each author argues on the multifold aspects of probability then he establishes the mathematical theory on the basis of his intellectual conclusions. It may be said that mathematics ranks second. Hilbert foresees an approach far different from that used by the sampled authors. He proposes to axiomatize the probability calculus notably to describe the probability concepts using purely mathematical criteria. In the second stage of the present research we address the four issues of the probability theory and statistics following the recommendations of Hilbert. Specifically, we use two theorems that prove how the frequentist and the subjectivist models are not incompatible as many believe. Probability has distinct meanings under different hypotheses, and in turn classical statistics and Bayesian statistics are available for adoption in different circumstances. Subsequently, these results are commented upon, followed by our conclusions","PeriodicalId":429168,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: History and Overview","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-30.3.314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study has the purpose of addressing four questions that lie at the base of the probability theory and statistics, and includes two main steps. As first, we conduct the textual analysis of the most significant works written by eminent probability theorists. The textual analysis turns out to be a rather innovative method of study in this domain, and shows how the sampled writers, no matter he is a frequentist or a subjectivist, share a similar approach. Each author argues on the multifold aspects of probability then he establishes the mathematical theory on the basis of his intellectual conclusions. It may be said that mathematics ranks second. Hilbert foresees an approach far different from that used by the sampled authors. He proposes to axiomatize the probability calculus notably to describe the probability concepts using purely mathematical criteria. In the second stage of the present research we address the four issues of the probability theory and statistics following the recommendations of Hilbert. Specifically, we use two theorems that prove how the frequentist and the subjectivist models are not incompatible as many believe. Probability has distinct meanings under different hypotheses, and in turn classical statistics and Bayesian statistics are available for adoption in different circumstances. Subsequently, these results are commented upon, followed by our conclusions
概率论与统计学中的四个基本问题
本研究的目的是解决在概率论和统计学基础上的四个问题,包括两个主要步骤。首先,我们对著名的概率理论家所写的最重要的作品进行了文本分析。文本分析在这一领域是一种创新的研究方法,它显示了样本作者,无论他是频率主义者还是主观主义者,都有相似的研究方法。每个作者都从概率论的多个方面进行论证,然后在他的智力结论的基础上建立数学理论。可以说,数学排名第二。希尔伯特预测的方法与抽样作者使用的方法大不相同。他提出将概率演算公理化,特别是用纯数学标准来描述概率概念。在本研究的第二阶段,我们在希尔伯特的建议下解决了概率论和统计的四个问题。具体来说,我们使用两个定理来证明频率论和主观主义模型并不像许多人认为的那样是不相容的。概率在不同的假设下具有不同的含义,而经典统计和贝叶斯统计在不同的情况下可以采用。随后,对这些结果进行评论,然后是我们的结论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信