The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education and Problem Based Learning Model on Mathematics Problem Solving Ability in Terms of Precondition Mathematics Abilities

A. Palinussa, T. Dias, D. A. Ngilawajan
{"title":"The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education and Problem Based Learning Model on Mathematics Problem Solving Ability in Terms of Precondition Mathematics Abilities","authors":"A. Palinussa, T. Dias, D. A. Ngilawajan","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210508.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to compare two treatments, namely the realistic mathematics education approach (RME) and problem-based learning (PBL) towards students' mathematical problem-solving abilities. To obtain complete information about the comparison of the two models, we also used the non-treatment group as the control class. This research approach is quantitative using quasi-experimental methods. The design of this study is a nonequivalent comparison group design involving 243 students of SMA Negeri 14 Maluku, Indonesia, in the 2019/2020 academic year. The results showed that there were differences in students' problem abilities with the high, medium, and low Precondition Mathematics Abilities (PMA) categories. There is an interaction effect between RME, PBL, and conventional learning models with PMA on students' mathematical problem abilities.","PeriodicalId":251100,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ICMMEd 2020)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ICMMEd 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210508.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare two treatments, namely the realistic mathematics education approach (RME) and problem-based learning (PBL) towards students' mathematical problem-solving abilities. To obtain complete information about the comparison of the two models, we also used the non-treatment group as the control class. This research approach is quantitative using quasi-experimental methods. The design of this study is a nonequivalent comparison group design involving 243 students of SMA Negeri 14 Maluku, Indonesia, in the 2019/2020 academic year. The results showed that there were differences in students' problem abilities with the high, medium, and low Precondition Mathematics Abilities (PMA) categories. There is an interaction effect between RME, PBL, and conventional learning models with PMA on students' mathematical problem abilities.
从前提数学能力的角度看现实主义数学教育和问题基础学习模式对数学问题解决能力的影响
本研究的目的是比较现实数学教育方法(RME)和基于问题的学习(PBL)两种方法对学生数学解决能力的影响。为了获得两种模型比较的完整信息,我们还将非治疗组作为对照类。本研究采用准实验方法进行定量研究。本研究采用非等效对照组设计,研究对象为2019/2020学年印尼马鲁古SMA Negeri 14 Maluku的243名学生。结果表明,学生的问题能力在高、中、低前提数学能力(PMA)类别上存在差异。RME、PBL和传统学习模式对学生的数学问题能力有交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信