Auditing the Producer Price Index: Micro Evidence from Prescription Pharmaceutical Preparations

E. Berndt, Z. Griliches, J. Rosett
{"title":"Auditing the Producer Price Index: Micro Evidence from Prescription Pharmaceutical Preparations","authors":"E. Berndt, Z. Griliches, J. Rosett","doi":"10.1080/07350015.1993.10509953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From January 1984 through December 1989, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) price index for prescription pharmaceuticals grew at 9.09% per year. Using BLS-type Laspeyres index procedures with monthly price and quantity data on all prescription pharmaceuticals sold by four U.S. pharmaceutical manufacturers accounting for 24% of industry domestic sales, we find that the four-company index increases at 6.68% per year. When we employ a Divisia price index with smoothed weights incorporating new goods, the index grows 6.03% per year. Why does the BLS index grow 50% more rapidly than the Divisia index? That mystery is the focal point of our article.","PeriodicalId":393567,"journal":{"name":"Alfred P. Sloan: Empirical Economic Research Enablers (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"98","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alfred P. Sloan: Empirical Economic Research Enablers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1993.10509953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 98

Abstract

From January 1984 through December 1989, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) price index for prescription pharmaceuticals grew at 9.09% per year. Using BLS-type Laspeyres index procedures with monthly price and quantity data on all prescription pharmaceuticals sold by four U.S. pharmaceutical manufacturers accounting for 24% of industry domestic sales, we find that the four-company index increases at 6.68% per year. When we employ a Divisia price index with smoothed weights incorporating new goods, the index grows 6.03% per year. Why does the BLS index grow 50% more rapidly than the Divisia index? That mystery is the focal point of our article.
生产者价格指数审计:来自处方制剂的微观证据
从1984年1月到1989年12月,美国劳工统计局(BLS)的处方药价格指数每年增长9.09%。采用bls类型的Laspeyres指数程序,采用美国四家制药公司销售的所有处方药的月度价格和数量数据,占行业内销的24%,我们发现四家公司指数每年增长6.68%。当我们使用包含新商品的平滑权重的司分亚价格指数时,该指数每年增长6.03%。为什么BLS指数的增长速度比Divisia指数快50% ?这个谜团是我们这篇文章的焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信