Biopsychosocial pathways in dementia inequalities: Introduction to the Michigan Cognitive Aging Project.

L. Zahodne
{"title":"Biopsychosocial pathways in dementia inequalities: Introduction to the Michigan Cognitive Aging Project.","authors":"L. Zahodne","doi":"10.1037/amp0000936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Racial/ethnic inequalities in dementia risk are a major public health and health justice concern. Group differences that persist despite adjustment for socioeconomic and vascular indicators suggest that known dementia risk factors exhibit differential impact across race/ethnicity and/or there are unrecognized dementia risk factors that are racially patterned. This article provides targeted examples of both of these possibilities. First, depressive symptoms and white matter hyperintensities represent two known dementia risk factors that more strongly relate to negative cognitive outcomes among Black older adults than Whites, pointing to the need to consider contextual factors. Second, racial discrimination and external perceived control predict worse brain and cognitive aging above and beyond known risk factors. These psychosocial factors warrant explicit consideration in dementia cohort studies. Several challenges appear to be particularly relevant to the study of dementia inequalities, including selective survival and recruitment. These challenges complicate not only cross-study comparisons, but also within-study causal inferences. This article provides recommendations for addressing these challenges in order to accelerate high-quality research on dementia inequalities. Stemming from these recommendations, the article introduces the design and methods of the Michigan Cognitive Aging Project, a new, racially-balanced cohort study of Black and White adults transitioning to late life. In sum, careful research with community partners is needed to more fully explore the factors and contexts that create and sustain racial/ethnic disparities, as well as those that buffer against them. The ultimate goal of this research is to facilitate the dismantling of structural barriers to health justice for diverse older people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":217617,"journal":{"name":"The American psychologist","volume":"76 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Racial/ethnic inequalities in dementia risk are a major public health and health justice concern. Group differences that persist despite adjustment for socioeconomic and vascular indicators suggest that known dementia risk factors exhibit differential impact across race/ethnicity and/or there are unrecognized dementia risk factors that are racially patterned. This article provides targeted examples of both of these possibilities. First, depressive symptoms and white matter hyperintensities represent two known dementia risk factors that more strongly relate to negative cognitive outcomes among Black older adults than Whites, pointing to the need to consider contextual factors. Second, racial discrimination and external perceived control predict worse brain and cognitive aging above and beyond known risk factors. These psychosocial factors warrant explicit consideration in dementia cohort studies. Several challenges appear to be particularly relevant to the study of dementia inequalities, including selective survival and recruitment. These challenges complicate not only cross-study comparisons, but also within-study causal inferences. This article provides recommendations for addressing these challenges in order to accelerate high-quality research on dementia inequalities. Stemming from these recommendations, the article introduces the design and methods of the Michigan Cognitive Aging Project, a new, racially-balanced cohort study of Black and White adults transitioning to late life. In sum, careful research with community partners is needed to more fully explore the factors and contexts that create and sustain racial/ethnic disparities, as well as those that buffer against them. The ultimate goal of this research is to facilitate the dismantling of structural barriers to health justice for diverse older people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
痴呆症不平等的生物心理社会途径:密歇根认知衰老项目介绍。
痴呆症风险中的种族/族裔不平等是一个主要的公共卫生和卫生司法问题。尽管对社会经济和血管指标进行了调整,但群体差异仍然存在,这表明已知的痴呆风险因素在种族/民族和/或存在种族模式的未识别痴呆风险因素方面表现出不同的影响。本文提供了这两种可能性的有针对性的示例。首先,抑郁症状和白质高强度代表了两种已知的痴呆风险因素,与黑人老年人的负面认知结果的关系比白人更大,这表明需要考虑环境因素。其次,种族歧视和外部感知控制预示着大脑和认知老化的恶化,超出了已知的风险因素。这些社会心理因素需要在痴呆队列研究中明确考虑。一些挑战似乎与痴呆症不平等的研究特别相关,包括选择性生存和招募。这些挑战不仅使交叉研究比较复杂化,而且使研究内的因果推论复杂化。本文提供了应对这些挑战的建议,以加速对痴呆症不平等的高质量研究。根据这些建议,本文介绍了密歇根认知衰老项目的设计和方法,这是一项新的,种族平衡的黑人和白人成年人过渡到晚年的队列研究。总而言之,需要与社区伙伴进行仔细的研究,以更充分地探索造成和维持种族/民族差异的因素和背景,以及对这些差异起到缓冲作用的因素和背景。这项研究的最终目标是促进消除各种老年人健康正义的结构性障碍。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信