Afterlife (Antiquity and Byzantine Era)

L. Canfora
{"title":"Afterlife (Antiquity and Byzantine Era)","authors":"L. Canfora","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198713852.013.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 33 focuses on Demosthenes’ reception in antiquity and during the Byzantine Era. In particular, it examines the character and value of the 15 ‘demegoriai’ that survive from Demosthenes’ Assembly speeches, first by discussing the peculiarly Demosthenic phenomenon of a first version written already in a highly elaborated form. Demosthenes was perhaps influenced here by Isocrates’ important innovation, the written speech that presented itself as if it had been delivered; this practice is also documented in Demosthenes’ circle by the On Halonnesus of his associate Hegesippus. These innovative practices became the object of attention for the generation of critics immediately following Demosthenes. The article considers the reception of Demosthenes by looking at the works of Theopompus of Chios, Anaximenes of Lampsacus, Timaeus, Aesion, Hermippus, Demochares, Callimachus, Polybius, Cicero, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Didymus of Alexandria, Hermogenes of Tarsus, Plutarch, Lucian of Samosata, Aelius Aristides, Libanius, Zosimus, and Photius.","PeriodicalId":431595,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Demosthenes","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Demosthenes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198713852.013.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 33 focuses on Demosthenes’ reception in antiquity and during the Byzantine Era. In particular, it examines the character and value of the 15 ‘demegoriai’ that survive from Demosthenes’ Assembly speeches, first by discussing the peculiarly Demosthenic phenomenon of a first version written already in a highly elaborated form. Demosthenes was perhaps influenced here by Isocrates’ important innovation, the written speech that presented itself as if it had been delivered; this practice is also documented in Demosthenes’ circle by the On Halonnesus of his associate Hegesippus. These innovative practices became the object of attention for the generation of critics immediately following Demosthenes. The article considers the reception of Demosthenes by looking at the works of Theopompus of Chios, Anaximenes of Lampsacus, Timaeus, Aesion, Hermippus, Demochares, Callimachus, Polybius, Cicero, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Didymus of Alexandria, Hermogenes of Tarsus, Plutarch, Lucian of Samosata, Aelius Aristides, Libanius, Zosimus, and Photius.
来世(古代和拜占庭时代)
第33章着重于古代和拜占庭时代对德摩斯梯尼的接受。特别是,它考察了从德摩斯梯尼大会演讲中幸存下来的15篇“demegoriai”的特征和价值,首先讨论了德摩斯梯尼特有的现象,即已经以高度阐述的形式写成的第一个版本。德摩斯梯尼可能受到伊索克拉底重要创新的影响,书面演讲就像已经发表过一样;在德摩斯梯尼的圈子里,这种做法也被他的同伴希格西普斯的《论哈罗尼索斯》记录了下来。这些创新的实践成为了德摩斯梯尼之后一代批评家关注的对象。本文通过考察希俄斯的忒奥波布斯、兰普萨科斯的阿那克西米尼、蒂迈乌斯、埃西翁、赫米普乌斯、德谟卡雷斯、卡利马科斯、波利比乌斯、西塞罗、哈利卡那苏斯的狄奥尼修斯、亚历山大的狄狄莫斯、塔尔苏斯的赫莫奇尼、普鲁塔克、萨莫萨塔的卢西恩、阿利乌斯·阿里斯蒂德斯、利巴尼乌斯、佐西穆斯和福提乌斯的著作,来考虑对德谟西尼的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信