Iranian National COVID-19 Electronic Screening System: A Mixed-Method Usability Evaluation

Zahra Mohahammadzadeh, A. Nickfarjam, Afshin Babajani, F. Jeddi
{"title":"Iranian National COVID-19 Electronic Screening System: A Mixed-Method Usability Evaluation","authors":"Zahra Mohahammadzadeh, A. Nickfarjam, Afshin Babajani, F. Jeddi","doi":"10.1109/ICWR54782.2022.9786231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to determine the mixed-method usability evaluation of the Iranian national covid-19 electronic screening system. The cross-sectional study was carried out in partnership with 116 users of the Iranian national covid-19 electronic screening system and five experts. As a result of the experts’ assessment, the Iranian national covid-19 electronic screening system scored 0-2 out of the 10 principles of Nielsen Jacob, which indicates a good approach to the design of this system. To evaluate, the questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (QUIS) version 7 was used. Data were analyzed by spss version 19. A total of 112 out of 116 questionnaires were obtained. In the Iranian national covid-19 electronic screening system, nine (33.3%) of the 27 sections scored higher than seven. More than half scored over five. There were no factors in the terminology and system information and learning section between 7 and 9; the highest rankings in the section overall responses to the software were 1) terrible-wonderful 2) difficult-easy; in the section overall reactions to the software, all of the factors were highest; also, the highest rankings were in the section “system capability” for 1) system speed 2) system reliability 3) designed for all levels of users.","PeriodicalId":355187,"journal":{"name":"2022 8th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 8th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWR54782.2022.9786231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the mixed-method usability evaluation of the Iranian national covid-19 electronic screening system. The cross-sectional study was carried out in partnership with 116 users of the Iranian national covid-19 electronic screening system and five experts. As a result of the experts’ assessment, the Iranian national covid-19 electronic screening system scored 0-2 out of the 10 principles of Nielsen Jacob, which indicates a good approach to the design of this system. To evaluate, the questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (QUIS) version 7 was used. Data were analyzed by spss version 19. A total of 112 out of 116 questionnaires were obtained. In the Iranian national covid-19 electronic screening system, nine (33.3%) of the 27 sections scored higher than seven. More than half scored over five. There were no factors in the terminology and system information and learning section between 7 and 9; the highest rankings in the section overall responses to the software were 1) terrible-wonderful 2) difficult-easy; in the section overall reactions to the software, all of the factors were highest; also, the highest rankings were in the section “system capability” for 1) system speed 2) system reliability 3) designed for all levels of users.
伊朗国家COVID-19电子筛查系统:混合方法可用性评估
本研究旨在确定伊朗国家covid-19电子筛查系统的混合方法可用性评估。这项横断面研究是与116名伊朗国家covid-19电子筛查系统用户和5名专家合作进行的。专家评估结果显示,在尼尔森雅各布的10项原则中,伊朗全国新冠病毒电子筛查系统获得了0-2分,这表明该系统的设计方法很好。为了进行评估,使用了用户交互满意度问卷(QUIS)第7版。数据采用spss 19进行分析。在116份问卷中,共获得112份。在伊朗全国新冠肺炎电子筛查系统中,27个部门中有9个(33.3%)的得分超过7分。超过一半的学生得分超过5分。在7 - 9分的术语和系统信息和学习部分没有因素;该部分对软件的总体反应中排名最高的是:1)糟糕-很棒;2)困难-容易;在对软件的总体反应部分,所有因素都是最高的;此外,排名最高的是“系统能力”部分,即1)系统速度2)系统可靠性3)为所有级别的用户设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信