KICK-START LITERACY FOR ALL. COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM ROMANIAN PREPARATORY GRADE CLASSROOMS

Bianca Balea, M. Kovács, Codruta Temple
{"title":"KICK-START LITERACY FOR ALL. COMPARATIVE RESULTS FROM ROMANIAN PREPARATORY GRADE CLASSROOMS","authors":"Bianca Balea, M. Kovács, Codruta Temple","doi":"10.26755/revped/2023.1/149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research shows that reading performance in the early grades is a strong predictor of reading ability throughout the school years, and is therefore likely to impact children’s academic and career trajectories, with those of children coming from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds being negatively impacted (Cunningham & Stanovich, 1997; Dolean et al., 2019). Using a comparative approach, the present study aimed to determine whether there were differences in literacy skills development in children from low socio-economic backgrounds who received specifically developed emergent literacy instruction (intervention group, IG) and those who did not (control group, CG). The literacy program was developed based on recent scientific evidence (Bear, 2022) emphasizing the importance of the following in emergent literacy instruction: concepts about print (1), alphabet and letter-sound knowledge (2), concept of word (3), phoneme awareness (4), and word recognition (5). The intervention took place in the 2021-2022 school year, over an 8-month period, and consisted of using emergent literacy assessments, as well as literacy learning materials developed specifically for the preparatory grades. The total sample consisted of 300 children in 25 preparatory grade classes, divided between intervention and control groups (260 and 40 students, respectively), who were all assessed on the five abovementioned emergent literacy concepts and skills, pre- and post-intervention. ANOVA analyses were conducted to test for differences between children in the two groups. Results highlight significant differences in terms of literacy development, with children in IG showing higher scores on all the five measures than children in the CG.","PeriodicalId":346977,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pedagogy - Revista de Pedagogie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pedagogy - Revista de Pedagogie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26755/revped/2023.1/149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research shows that reading performance in the early grades is a strong predictor of reading ability throughout the school years, and is therefore likely to impact children’s academic and career trajectories, with those of children coming from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds being negatively impacted (Cunningham & Stanovich, 1997; Dolean et al., 2019). Using a comparative approach, the present study aimed to determine whether there were differences in literacy skills development in children from low socio-economic backgrounds who received specifically developed emergent literacy instruction (intervention group, IG) and those who did not (control group, CG). The literacy program was developed based on recent scientific evidence (Bear, 2022) emphasizing the importance of the following in emergent literacy instruction: concepts about print (1), alphabet and letter-sound knowledge (2), concept of word (3), phoneme awareness (4), and word recognition (5). The intervention took place in the 2021-2022 school year, over an 8-month period, and consisted of using emergent literacy assessments, as well as literacy learning materials developed specifically for the preparatory grades. The total sample consisted of 300 children in 25 preparatory grade classes, divided between intervention and control groups (260 and 40 students, respectively), who were all assessed on the five abovementioned emergent literacy concepts and skills, pre- and post-intervention. ANOVA analyses were conducted to test for differences between children in the two groups. Results highlight significant differences in terms of literacy development, with children in IG showing higher scores on all the five measures than children in the CG.
启动全民扫盲。罗马尼亚预科班级的比较结果
研究表明,早期年级的阅读表现是整个学年阅读能力的一个强有力的预测指标,因此可能会影响儿童的学业和职业轨迹,而那些来自弱势社会经济背景的儿童会受到负面影响(Cunningham & Stanovich, 1997;Dolean et al., 2019)。采用比较方法,本研究旨在确定低社会经济背景的儿童在接受专门开发的紧急识字教学(干预组,IG)和未接受紧急识字教学(对照组,CG)的情况下,识字技能发展是否存在差异。扫盲计划是根据最近的科学证据制定的(Bear, 2022),强调了以下内容在紧急扫盲教学中的重要性:关于印刷(1)、字母和字母发音知识(2)、单词概念(3)、音素意识(4)和单词识别(5)的概念。干预在2021-2022学年进行,为期8个月,包括使用紧急读写能力评估,以及专门为预科年级开发的读写能力学习材料。总样本由25个预科班的300名儿童组成,分为干预组和对照组(分别为260名和40名学生),他们在干预前和干预后都对上述五种紧急读写概念和技能进行了评估。采用方差分析来检验两组儿童之间的差异。结果突出了读写能力发展方面的显著差异,IG组的儿童在所有五项指标上的得分都高于CG组的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信