Reflective Keys of Integrative Research Studies in A Graduate Design Management Program, Thailand

Jitiporn Wongwatcharapaiboon, Akapan Thienthaworn, Adi Pramono Budiwan
{"title":"Reflective Keys of Integrative Research Studies in A Graduate Design Management Program, Thailand","authors":"Jitiporn Wongwatcharapaiboon, Akapan Thienthaworn, Adi Pramono Budiwan","doi":"10.56261/jars.v21.257158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nThis research aims to investigate the keys of research learning based on advanced-case studies in the graduate Design, Business and Technology Management (DBTM) program, Thammasat University, Thailand. Specifically, these advanced case studies are previously completed theses selected to represent certain research typologies that reflect the program goals. The program takes a novel approach in motivating students to creatively pursue their own research questions by engaging them with in-depth group discussions, content presentations from academic and practitioner experts, authentic, project-based practices in collaboration with different private and public-sector stakeholders, and the advanced research case studies. The methodology of this paper follows a qualitative research approach that relies on Stufflebeam’s CIPP model consisting of context, input, process and product elements. Along with class activities, the context of programs and learning types are first explored in relation to class and research inputs from 7 advanced case studies (theses) that focus on different components of the DBTM program. Then, the process of using focus groups in the classes to provide the students with exposure to authentic research experiences, culminating in their own research proposal presentations is discussed. Each of the student’s research proposals must include elements of multi-context research and are evaluated by a faculty committee and external experts, based on the study themes of DBTM and learning types. Most students tend to focus more on design and business concepts in their research proposals with less emphasis on the technology and management fields. A reflective key of the case study approach is the learning of a combination of cognitive, meaning and connectivism concepts to improve research understanding. To support this pedagogical approach, class activities are delivered through a combination of short lectures, sharing discussions for meaning learning, and well-rounded literature review for connectivism learning. These key findings contribute directly to the sustainable development of the master’s curriculum in the Design, Business and Technology Management program.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":428713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","volume":"04 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v21.257158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the keys of research learning based on advanced-case studies in the graduate Design, Business and Technology Management (DBTM) program, Thammasat University, Thailand. Specifically, these advanced case studies are previously completed theses selected to represent certain research typologies that reflect the program goals. The program takes a novel approach in motivating students to creatively pursue their own research questions by engaging them with in-depth group discussions, content presentations from academic and practitioner experts, authentic, project-based practices in collaboration with different private and public-sector stakeholders, and the advanced research case studies. The methodology of this paper follows a qualitative research approach that relies on Stufflebeam’s CIPP model consisting of context, input, process and product elements. Along with class activities, the context of programs and learning types are first explored in relation to class and research inputs from 7 advanced case studies (theses) that focus on different components of the DBTM program. Then, the process of using focus groups in the classes to provide the students with exposure to authentic research experiences, culminating in their own research proposal presentations is discussed. Each of the student’s research proposals must include elements of multi-context research and are evaluated by a faculty committee and external experts, based on the study themes of DBTM and learning types. Most students tend to focus more on design and business concepts in their research proposals with less emphasis on the technology and management fields. A reflective key of the case study approach is the learning of a combination of cognitive, meaning and connectivism concepts to improve research understanding. To support this pedagogical approach, class activities are delivered through a combination of short lectures, sharing discussions for meaning learning, and well-rounded literature review for connectivism learning. These key findings contribute directly to the sustainable development of the master’s curriculum in the Design, Business and Technology Management program.
设计管理研究生课程整合研究的反思关键,泰国
本研究以泰国法政大学设计、商业与技术管理(DBTM)研究生课程为研究对象,探讨研究性学习的关键。具体来说,这些高级案例研究是以前完成的论文,被选中代表反映项目目标的某些研究类型。该计划采用一种新颖的方法,通过深入的小组讨论,学术和从业者专家的内容介绍,与不同的私人和公共部门利益相关者合作的真实的,基于项目的实践,以及先进的研究案例研究,激励学生创造性地追求自己的研究问题。本文的方法论遵循定性研究方法,依赖于Stufflebeam的CIPP模型,该模型由上下文、输入、过程和产品元素组成。随着课堂活动的开展,课程的背景和学习类型首先与7个高级案例研究(论文)的课堂和研究投入进行了探讨,这些案例研究侧重于DBTM项目的不同组成部分。然后,在课堂上使用焦点小组的过程中,为学生提供了真实的研究经验,最终在他们自己的研究计划报告中进行了讨论。每个学生的研究建议必须包括多背景研究的元素,并由教师委员会和外部专家根据DBTM的研究主题和学习类型进行评估。大多数学生倾向于在他们的研究计划中更多地关注设计和商业概念,而不是技术和管理领域。案例研究方法的一个反思关键是学习认知主义、意义主义和联系主义概念的结合,以提高对研究的理解。为了支持这种教学方法,课堂活动通过简短的讲座,分享讨论的意义学习,以及全面的文献综述的联系主义学习相结合。这些重要发现直接有助于设计、商业和技术管理硕士课程的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信