Long-Term Mechanical Properties of Barrier Materials for Cementing Operations – Analysis of Morphology and Micro-Structure

M. Kamali, M. Khalifeh, A. Saasen, Paulo Henrique Silva Santos Moreira
{"title":"Long-Term Mechanical Properties of Barrier Materials for Cementing Operations – Analysis of Morphology and Micro-Structure","authors":"M. Kamali, M. Khalifeh, A. Saasen, Paulo Henrique Silva Santos Moreira","doi":"10.1115/omae2022-78634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the oil and gas and geothermal industry, a barrier material is pumped behind the casing to fill the annular gap between the casing and formation/outer casing. After placement, this slurry is solidified rapidly, and it functions to seal the annular space and protects the casing during the lifecycle of the well. In this article, four different barrier materials namely expansive cement, non-cement pozzolan-based material, geopolymer, and thermosetting resin are examined under equal conditions.\n The long-term mechanical properties of the candidate materials were tested by measuring uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), tensile strength, and Young’s modulus. These properties were measured at seven different time intervals, from one day to nine months after curing at a bottomhole static temperature of 90 °C and pressure of 170 bars. The change in the mechanical properties was further investigated by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) techniques. The results were benchmarked with the properties of the API neat class G cement as non-commercial reference material.\n Our results show that the neat class G cement had a consistent behavior in most of the test period, and its UCS was dropped by 23 % after nine months compared to six months. The expansive cement had no significant change in mechanical properties, but the expansive crystal can weaken the structure, especially close to the boundaries with the cement matrix. The pozzolanic material and geopolymer did not develop early strength. The pozzolanic material reached a plateau after seven days, while the geopolymer developed strength up to six months. The thermosetting resin had the highest UCS and tensile strength up to one month, but its mechanical properties were started to deteriorate from seven days after curing.","PeriodicalId":363084,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Petroleum Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Petroleum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2022-78634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the oil and gas and geothermal industry, a barrier material is pumped behind the casing to fill the annular gap between the casing and formation/outer casing. After placement, this slurry is solidified rapidly, and it functions to seal the annular space and protects the casing during the lifecycle of the well. In this article, four different barrier materials namely expansive cement, non-cement pozzolan-based material, geopolymer, and thermosetting resin are examined under equal conditions. The long-term mechanical properties of the candidate materials were tested by measuring uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), tensile strength, and Young’s modulus. These properties were measured at seven different time intervals, from one day to nine months after curing at a bottomhole static temperature of 90 °C and pressure of 170 bars. The change in the mechanical properties was further investigated by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) techniques. The results were benchmarked with the properties of the API neat class G cement as non-commercial reference material. Our results show that the neat class G cement had a consistent behavior in most of the test period, and its UCS was dropped by 23 % after nine months compared to six months. The expansive cement had no significant change in mechanical properties, but the expansive crystal can weaken the structure, especially close to the boundaries with the cement matrix. The pozzolanic material and geopolymer did not develop early strength. The pozzolanic material reached a plateau after seven days, while the geopolymer developed strength up to six months. The thermosetting resin had the highest UCS and tensile strength up to one month, but its mechanical properties were started to deteriorate from seven days after curing.
固井作业用阻隔材料的长期机械性能。形态和微观结构分析
在油气和地热行业中,在套管后面泵入一种阻隔材料,以填充套管与地层/外层套管之间的环空间隙。注入后,该泥浆迅速固化,在井的生命周期内起到密封环空空间和保护套管的作用。在同等条件下,研究了四种不同的阻隔材料,即膨胀水泥、非水泥火山灰基材料、地聚合物和热固性树脂。通过测量单轴抗压强度(UCS)、抗拉强度和杨氏模量来测试候选材料的长期力学性能。在90°C的井底静态温度和170 bar的压力下,在1天到9个月的时间间隔内测量了这些性能。利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散x射线能谱(EDS)技术进一步研究了其力学性能的变化。结果以API纯G类水泥的性能作为非商业参考材料进行基准测试。我们的研究结果表明,整齐的G类水泥在大部分测试期间具有一致的行为,与6个月相比,9个月后其UCS下降了23%。膨胀后水泥的力学性能没有明显变化,但膨胀晶体会削弱水泥的结构,尤其是靠近水泥基体的边界处。火山灰材料和地聚合物未形成早期强度。火山灰材料在7天后达到稳定状态,而地聚合物在6个月内发展强度。热固性树脂在一个月内具有最高的UCS和抗拉强度,但其力学性能在固化后7天开始恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信