Unmasking Mutual Fund Derivative Use

Ron Kaniel, Pingle Wang
{"title":"Unmasking Mutual Fund Derivative Use","authors":"Ron Kaniel, Pingle Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3692838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Utilizing new SEC data enabling us to compute mutual funds' derivative positions performance, this paper studies how derivatives impact fund performance. In contrast to prior research concluding derivatives are used for hedging, we find that most active equity funds use them to amplify market exposure in conjunction with reducing fund equity exposure to market risk. Despite seemingly small weights, derivatives have a significant impact on funds' leverage and contribute largely to fund returns and cross-sectional differences in returns. Funds extensively using derivatives underperform, yet receive more flows. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, funds regularly utilizing derivatives trade more heavily on short derivative positions. The pattern is more prevalent among managers for which the risk of recession is likely more salient. There is no change in extensive margin of derivative use. Hedging funds, which are the minority, outperform significantly during the outbreak. Amplifying funds suffer a double whammy. While they do shift strategies, they are slow to react and experience similarly large losses to nonusers in the outbreak phase. By the time they shift, the market has already started to rebound, and they lose on their short positions. Funds are slow to unwind shorts during the recovery. Shifts in derivative return distributions during the COVID-19 crisis are mostly driven by swaps, which have been ignored by previous studies.","PeriodicalId":306152,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3692838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Utilizing new SEC data enabling us to compute mutual funds' derivative positions performance, this paper studies how derivatives impact fund performance. In contrast to prior research concluding derivatives are used for hedging, we find that most active equity funds use them to amplify market exposure in conjunction with reducing fund equity exposure to market risk. Despite seemingly small weights, derivatives have a significant impact on funds' leverage and contribute largely to fund returns and cross-sectional differences in returns. Funds extensively using derivatives underperform, yet receive more flows. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, funds regularly utilizing derivatives trade more heavily on short derivative positions. The pattern is more prevalent among managers for which the risk of recession is likely more salient. There is no change in extensive margin of derivative use. Hedging funds, which are the minority, outperform significantly during the outbreak. Amplifying funds suffer a double whammy. While they do shift strategies, they are slow to react and experience similarly large losses to nonusers in the outbreak phase. By the time they shift, the market has already started to rebound, and they lose on their short positions. Funds are slow to unwind shorts during the recovery. Shifts in derivative return distributions during the COVID-19 crisis are mostly driven by swaps, which have been ignored by previous studies.
揭露共同基金衍生工具用途
本文利用美国证券交易委员会的新数据来计算共同基金的衍生品头寸绩效,研究衍生品如何影响基金绩效。与先前的研究结论相反,衍生品被用于对冲,我们发现大多数活跃的股票基金使用它们来扩大市场敞口,同时减少基金股票对市场风险的敞口。尽管衍生品的权重看似很小,但对基金的杠杆率有显著影响,并对基金收益和收益的横截面差异有很大贡献。广泛使用衍生品的基金表现不佳,但却获得了更多的资金流。为应对新冠肺炎疫情,利用衍生品的基金经常加大对衍生品空头头寸的交易力度。这种模式在经济衰退风险可能更为突出的经理人中更为普遍。衍生品使用的广泛边际没有变化。在疫情爆发期间,对冲基金(占少数)的表现明显优于其他基金。放大基金遭受双重打击。虽然他们确实改变了策略,但他们反应迟缓,在爆发阶段遭受了与非用户类似的巨大损失。当他们转移的时候,市场已经开始反弹,他们的空头头寸损失了。在经济复苏期间,基金在解除空头头寸方面行动迟缓。在新冠肺炎危机期间,衍生品收益分布的变化主要是由掉期驱动的,这一点被以往的研究所忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信