A Study of Vadose Zone Transport Model VLEACH

Y. Rong
{"title":"A Study of Vadose Zone Transport Model VLEACH","authors":"Y. Rong","doi":"10.1080/10588339991339315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Application of vadose zone transport models has been hampered by lack of model validation. Difficulties to validate vadose zone models using field data not only come from model assumptions that are uncertain to the subsurface transport processes but also from the uncertainties associated with soil contaminants’ release time and quantity, soil sampling, sample transport, and analytical procedures. This article first conducts a test of a popularly used vadose zone transport VLEACH by comparing model results with a set of laboratory soil column infiltration and volatilization study data. The comparison shows a close agreement between the VLEACH model results and the laboratory data. Second, the sorption coefficient Kd calculated in VLEACH is compared with field data. The comparison indicates that VLEACH may overestimate the mass leached from soil to groundwater. The article also discusses the selection of the model simulation timestep, the vertical dimension increment, the Courant criterion, and the lower bo...","PeriodicalId":433778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Contamination","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Contamination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588339991339315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Application of vadose zone transport models has been hampered by lack of model validation. Difficulties to validate vadose zone models using field data not only come from model assumptions that are uncertain to the subsurface transport processes but also from the uncertainties associated with soil contaminants’ release time and quantity, soil sampling, sample transport, and analytical procedures. This article first conducts a test of a popularly used vadose zone transport VLEACH by comparing model results with a set of laboratory soil column infiltration and volatilization study data. The comparison shows a close agreement between the VLEACH model results and the laboratory data. Second, the sorption coefficient Kd calculated in VLEACH is compared with field data. The comparison indicates that VLEACH may overestimate the mass leached from soil to groundwater. The article also discusses the selection of the model simulation timestep, the vertical dimension increment, the Courant criterion, and the lower bo...
渗流带输运模型VLEACH的研究
气包带输运模型的应用一直受到模型验证不足的阻碍。利用野外数据验证渗透带模型的困难不仅来自模型假设对地下运移过程的不确定性,还来自与土壤污染物释放时间和数量、土壤采样、样品运输和分析程序相关的不确定性。本文首先通过将模型结果与室内一组土壤柱入渗挥发研究数据进行对比,对一种常用的渗透带输运VLEACH进行了测试。对比表明,VLEACH模型的计算结果与实验室数据非常吻合。其次,将VLEACH计算的吸附系数Kd与现场数据进行了比较。对比表明,VLEACH方法可能高估了从土壤到地下水的浸出量。本文还讨论了模型仿真时间步长、垂直维数增量、Courant准则和下限的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信