Comparison of ‘Serial 7’s Subtraction’ and “Sam-Chun-Ri-Gang-San” Backward for Evaluation of in Primary Medicine

Yoon-Sung Cho, Sunyoung Kim, Hyunrim Choi, Byungsung Kim, C. Won
{"title":"Comparison of ‘Serial 7’s Subtraction’ and “Sam-Chun-Ri-Gang-San” Backward for Evaluation of in Primary Medicine","authors":"Yoon-Sung Cho, Sunyoung Kim, Hyunrim Choi, Byungsung Kim, C. Won","doi":"10.4235/JKGS.2015.19.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are two variations in the attention subitem of the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE): ‘serial 7’s subtraction and “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward. At a scale of one to five, they can be used interchangeably, which inevitably brings a considerable difference in results. Thus, we compared the scores of the ‘serial 7’s subtraction’ and the “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward and analyzed the influence of sociodemographic factors on the differences. Methods: We administered the Korean MMSE including the two types of attention item: serial 7’s and “sam-chun-rigang-san” backward to 239 community-dwelling elderly people aged 65 or older in Kyung Hee University Medical Center and four Seoul senior centers and analyzed the difference from June 2012 to July 2012. Results: The score for “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward (2.5±2.1) was lower than that of the serial 7’s (3.4±1.7) by a mean point of 0.9±1.9. The score of “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward was zero in 31.4% of the subjects. However, only 9.6% scored zero on the serial 7’s. The ratio of the same scores between two tasks was 36.0%. Education was the primary source of variance on difference score, followed by the number of family. There was no significant effect of age or gender when the score of difference was analyzed by multiple regression. Conclusion: In this study, subjects tended to outperform the serial 7’s in general. Upon administering “sam-chun-rigang-san” backward instead of serial 7’s due to the preference of the patient, we should take into account that the score of “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward was 0.9 point (mean value) lower than serial 7’s to ensure appropriate interpretation of MMSE score.","PeriodicalId":191447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/JKGS.2015.19.1.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are two variations in the attention subitem of the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE): ‘serial 7’s subtraction and “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward. At a scale of one to five, they can be used interchangeably, which inevitably brings a considerable difference in results. Thus, we compared the scores of the ‘serial 7’s subtraction’ and the “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward and analyzed the influence of sociodemographic factors on the differences. Methods: We administered the Korean MMSE including the two types of attention item: serial 7’s and “sam-chun-rigang-san” backward to 239 community-dwelling elderly people aged 65 or older in Kyung Hee University Medical Center and four Seoul senior centers and analyzed the difference from June 2012 to July 2012. Results: The score for “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward (2.5±2.1) was lower than that of the serial 7’s (3.4±1.7) by a mean point of 0.9±1.9. The score of “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward was zero in 31.4% of the subjects. However, only 9.6% scored zero on the serial 7’s. The ratio of the same scores between two tasks was 36.0%. Education was the primary source of variance on difference score, followed by the number of family. There was no significant effect of age or gender when the score of difference was analyzed by multiple regression. Conclusion: In this study, subjects tended to outperform the serial 7’s in general. Upon administering “sam-chun-rigang-san” backward instead of serial 7’s due to the preference of the patient, we should take into account that the score of “sam-chun-ri-gang-san” backward was 0.9 point (mean value) lower than serial 7’s to ensure appropriate interpretation of MMSE score.
基础医学“七列减法”与“三春里刚散”逆向评价的比较
背景:迷你精神状态测试(MMSE)的注意分项有两种变化:序列7的减法和逆向的“sam-chun-ri-gang-san”。在1到5的范围内,它们可以互换使用,这不可避免地会带来相当大的结果差异。因此,我们将“序列7减法”和“三春里刚三”的得分进行反向比较,并分析社会人口因素对差异的影响。方法:对2012年6月至2012年7月在庆熙大学医学中心和首尔4家老年中心居住的239名65岁及以上的社区老年人进行韩国MMSE(包括系列7和“三春-阳江-山”两种关注项目)反推,分析其差异。结果:“三-春-日-岗-山”后向评分(2.5±2.1)比序列7的评分(3.4±1.7)平均低0.9±1.9点。31.4%的学生在“三春里刚山”后题中得分为零。然而,只有9.6%的人在系列7中得分为零。两个任务之间相同得分的比例为36.0%。教育程度是差异得分方差的主要来源,其次是家庭数量。多元回归分析差异分值时,年龄和性别无显著影响。结论:在本研究中,受试者总体上倾向于表现优于系列7。由于患者的偏好,在用“三春-里江-山”代替序列7后给药时,应考虑到“三春-里江-山”后给药比序列7低0.9分(平均值),以确保MMSE评分的合理解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信