Unsupervised Legal Concept Extraction from Indian Case Documents using Statutes

Riya Sanjay Podder, Paheli Bhattacharya
{"title":"Unsupervised Legal Concept Extraction from Indian Case Documents using Statutes","authors":"Riya Sanjay Podder, Paheli Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1145/3441501.3441508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding legal concepts pertaining to court case judgement documents, is an important task in the field of legal data mining. These concepts are also popularly termed as catchwords/keywords. Existing methods for the task lack the ability to extract legal concepts that may not explicitly be mentioned in the document, but present abstractly. This is because the methods do not incorporate legal domain specific information. In this paper, we propose the use of Statutes to solve this task. Evaluation on a set of 1200 Indian Supreme Court Case Documents suggest the effectiveness of our approach, and opens the possibilities of exploring more in this direction.","PeriodicalId":415985,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3441501.3441508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finding legal concepts pertaining to court case judgement documents, is an important task in the field of legal data mining. These concepts are also popularly termed as catchwords/keywords. Existing methods for the task lack the ability to extract legal concepts that may not explicitly be mentioned in the document, but present abstractly. This is because the methods do not incorporate legal domain specific information. In this paper, we propose the use of Statutes to solve this task. Evaluation on a set of 1200 Indian Supreme Court Case Documents suggest the effectiveness of our approach, and opens the possibilities of exploring more in this direction.
用成文法提取印度案例文件中的无监督法律概念
寻找与案件判决书相关的法律概念,是法律数据挖掘领域的一项重要任务。这些概念通常也被称为流行语/关键词。这项任务的现有方法缺乏提取文件中可能没有明确提到但抽象地提出的法律概念的能力。这是因为这些方法不包含法律领域特定的信息。在本文中,我们建议使用法规来解决这一任务。对1200份印度最高法院案件文件的评估表明,我们的方法是有效的,并打开了在这个方向上进行更多探索的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信