Evaluation and Economic Analysis of Some Integrated Pest Management Packages for Suppressing Tube Spittle bug ( Machaerota planitiae Distant) Infesting Jujube ( Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk), in North-Western Bangladesh

M. Prodhan, M. Noman, M. Hasan, M. Maleque
{"title":"Evaluation and Economic Analysis of Some Integrated Pest Management Packages for Suppressing Tube Spittle bug ( Machaerota planitiae Distant) Infesting Jujube ( Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk), in North-Western Bangladesh","authors":"M. Prodhan, M. Noman, M. Hasan, M. Maleque","doi":"10.3329/AGRIC.V14I1.29100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To develop a suitable integrated pest management (IPM) package(s) against tube spittle bug attacking jujube, the study was conducted at the farmer’s orchard at Sherpur Upazilla of Bogra district, Bangladesh during the two consecutive winter seasons of 2011-12 and 2012-13. There were five IPM packages viz., P 1 = Clean cultivation + collection and destruction of tube with alive nymph from the branches, P 2 =P 1 + two sprays of Detergent @ 2gl -1 of water applied (at initial stage of infestation and 10 days after 1 st spray), P 3 =P 1 + two sprays of crushed Neem seed extract @ 150 gl -1 of water (at initial stage of infestation and 10 days after 1 st spray), P 4 =P 1 + sprays of Cypermethrin @ 1 mll -1 of water at initial stage of infestation, P 5 =P 4 + one additional spray of Cypermethrin @ 1mll -1 at 10 days after 1 st spray and an untreated control. In both the years, treatment P 5 was found most effective, which resulted lower damage to inflorescence and produced higher yield, followed by P 4 and P 3.  In case of marginal benefit cost ratio, the highest value (15.69 & 20.63) was obtained from the treatment P 5 which was closely followed by P 4 (15.07 &20.12) in both of years, respectively. The Agriculturists 2016; 14(1) 54-62","PeriodicalId":322702,"journal":{"name":"The Agriculturists","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Agriculturists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/AGRIC.V14I1.29100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To develop a suitable integrated pest management (IPM) package(s) against tube spittle bug attacking jujube, the study was conducted at the farmer’s orchard at Sherpur Upazilla of Bogra district, Bangladesh during the two consecutive winter seasons of 2011-12 and 2012-13. There were five IPM packages viz., P 1 = Clean cultivation + collection and destruction of tube with alive nymph from the branches, P 2 =P 1 + two sprays of Detergent @ 2gl -1 of water applied (at initial stage of infestation and 10 days after 1 st spray), P 3 =P 1 + two sprays of crushed Neem seed extract @ 150 gl -1 of water (at initial stage of infestation and 10 days after 1 st spray), P 4 =P 1 + sprays of Cypermethrin @ 1 mll -1 of water at initial stage of infestation, P 5 =P 4 + one additional spray of Cypermethrin @ 1mll -1 at 10 days after 1 st spray and an untreated control. In both the years, treatment P 5 was found most effective, which resulted lower damage to inflorescence and produced higher yield, followed by P 4 and P 3.  In case of marginal benefit cost ratio, the highest value (15.69 & 20.63) was obtained from the treatment P 5 which was closely followed by P 4 (15.07 &20.12) in both of years, respectively. The Agriculturists 2016; 14(1) 54-62
几种防治孟加拉西北部枣树管状吐虫(Machaerota planitiae Distant)综合治理方案的评价与经济分析
为了开发合适的虫害综合治理(IPM)方案来防治管状唾沫虫对枣树的侵害,研究人员于2011-12和2012-13连续两个冬季在孟加拉国Bogra区Sherpur Upazilla的农民果园进行了研究。有五名IPM包即P 1 =清洁种植+收集和破坏管分支的活女神,P 2 P = 1 + 2喷雾清洁剂@ 2 gl 1的水应用(在侵扰的初始阶段和后10天1 st喷雾),P 3 = 1 +两个喷雾的压印楝种子提取@ 150 gl 1的水(在侵扰的初始阶段和后10天1 st喷雾),P 4 = 1 +喷洒氯氰菊酯@ 1 mll 1的水在感染初期,p5 = p4 +在第一次喷雾后10天再喷一次氯氰菊酯@ 1ml -1和未经处理的对照。在这两个年份中,处理p5效果最好,对花序的损害较小,产量较高,其次是处理4和处理3。在边际效益成本比的情况下,在这两个年份中,处理p5获得的值最高(15.69 & 20.63),其次是处理p4(15.07 &20.12)。农业学家2016;14 (1) 54 - 62
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信