Impact of recent privacy legislation: Minnesota and federal

ACM '75 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1145/800181.810366
George Morrow
{"title":"Impact of recent privacy legislation: Minnesota and federal","authors":"George Morrow","doi":"10.1145/800181.810366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The panelists will examine recent Minnesota and Federal privacy legislation for the purpose of determining the extent to which this legislation has accomplished or failed to accomplish announced theoretical objectives. Clearly, such legislation has been unsuccessful in accommodating the expectations of the theorists. Thus, in Minnesota the Data Privacy Act, as amended, is only partly involved with privacy but very deeply concerned with records management and the right of public access—a right and process which is actually antagonistic to the exercise of the right of privacy.\n Data processing systems designers have been affected. All are wondering what impact the “law” will have on file design. Some, involved at the early stages of the legislative process, or in the development of a privacy theory, have had their expectations upset. The discussion will focus on ways in which administrative necessity and the legislative process have each served to reshape those expectations.","PeriodicalId":447373,"journal":{"name":"ACM '75","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '75","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800181.810366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The panelists will examine recent Minnesota and Federal privacy legislation for the purpose of determining the extent to which this legislation has accomplished or failed to accomplish announced theoretical objectives. Clearly, such legislation has been unsuccessful in accommodating the expectations of the theorists. Thus, in Minnesota the Data Privacy Act, as amended, is only partly involved with privacy but very deeply concerned with records management and the right of public access—a right and process which is actually antagonistic to the exercise of the right of privacy. Data processing systems designers have been affected. All are wondering what impact the “law” will have on file design. Some, involved at the early stages of the legislative process, or in the development of a privacy theory, have had their expectations upset. The discussion will focus on ways in which administrative necessity and the legislative process have each served to reshape those expectations.
最近隐私立法的影响:明尼苏达州和联邦
小组成员将审查最近明尼苏达州和联邦隐私立法,以确定该立法在多大程度上实现了或未能实现宣布的理论目标。显然,这样的立法未能满足理论家们的期望。因此,在明尼苏达州,经修订的《数据隐私法》仅部分涉及隐私,但与记录管理和公众访问权密切相关——这一权利和程序实际上与隐私权的行使相抵触。数据处理系统的设计者受到了影响。所有人都想知道“法律”将对文件设计产生什么影响。有些人参与了立法程序的早期阶段,或者参与了隐私理论的发展,他们的期望受到了影响。讨论的重点将是行政必要性和立法程序各自如何重塑这些期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信