Scholarships at Risk: The Mathematics of Merit Stipulations in Financial Aid Awards

J. Chen
{"title":"Scholarships at Risk: The Mathematics of Merit Stipulations in Financial Aid Awards","authors":"J. Chen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2133018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many law schools in the United States condition financial aid grants on the recipients’ maintenance of a certain grade point average. These merit stipulations require students to meet or exceed minimum academic standards in order to keep all or part of their financial aid. Law students should take merit stipulations into account when they decide whether to accept an offer of admission paired with a conditional grant of financial aid. By all accounts, they do not. Law schools should transparently disclose the likely effect of merit stipulations on their financial aid awards. By all accounts, law schools do no such thing. Absent external coercion, they are unlikely to change their current practices. In the absence of industry-wide standards counseling full disclosure of financial aid practices, this article will try to equip law school applicants with the mathematical tools to assess the real impact of merit stipulations on their financial well being.This article first presents very simple models for discounting financial aid awards for the risk of failure to uphold a merit stipulation. It outlines a simple methodology for calculating the expected value of a financial aid award subject to a merit stipulation. The article also evaluates one extraordinary circumstance in which a law school has implicitly revealed its break-even point - the amount of aid that the school would award if it did not impose any merit stipulations.Building upon those foundations, this article performs a comprehensive analysis of law school grades and merit stipulations as artifacts of the standard normal distribution. It performs three distinct tasks. This article defines standard scores and explains how law school grading is based on the relationship between the standard score of each student’s raw score and the mean and standard deviation of of the distribution as a whole. This article then describes the risk of failure to satisfy a merit stipulation in terms of the normal distribution’s cumulative distribution function. For those instances in which the risk of failure to satisfy a particular school’s merit stipulation is known, this article demonstrates how to use the inverse cumulative distribution function to estimate the mean and standard deviation of a school’s grade distribution. As a bonus, this final exercise provides an introduction to value-at-risk analysis, a leading tool for assessing risk in global capital markets.","PeriodicalId":337841,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2133018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many law schools in the United States condition financial aid grants on the recipients’ maintenance of a certain grade point average. These merit stipulations require students to meet or exceed minimum academic standards in order to keep all or part of their financial aid. Law students should take merit stipulations into account when they decide whether to accept an offer of admission paired with a conditional grant of financial aid. By all accounts, they do not. Law schools should transparently disclose the likely effect of merit stipulations on their financial aid awards. By all accounts, law schools do no such thing. Absent external coercion, they are unlikely to change their current practices. In the absence of industry-wide standards counseling full disclosure of financial aid practices, this article will try to equip law school applicants with the mathematical tools to assess the real impact of merit stipulations on their financial well being.This article first presents very simple models for discounting financial aid awards for the risk of failure to uphold a merit stipulation. It outlines a simple methodology for calculating the expected value of a financial aid award subject to a merit stipulation. The article also evaluates one extraordinary circumstance in which a law school has implicitly revealed its break-even point - the amount of aid that the school would award if it did not impose any merit stipulations.Building upon those foundations, this article performs a comprehensive analysis of law school grades and merit stipulations as artifacts of the standard normal distribution. It performs three distinct tasks. This article defines standard scores and explains how law school grading is based on the relationship between the standard score of each student’s raw score and the mean and standard deviation of of the distribution as a whole. This article then describes the risk of failure to satisfy a merit stipulation in terms of the normal distribution’s cumulative distribution function. For those instances in which the risk of failure to satisfy a particular school’s merit stipulation is known, this article demonstrates how to use the inverse cumulative distribution function to estimate the mean and standard deviation of a school’s grade distribution. As a bonus, this final exercise provides an introduction to value-at-risk analysis, a leading tool for assessing risk in global capital markets.
面临风险的奖学金:经济援助奖中优异规定的数学
美国的许多法学院将助学金的发放条件建立在学生保持一定的平均成绩上。这些成绩规定要求学生达到或超过最低学术标准,以保留全部或部分经济援助。法律专业的学生在决定是否接受与有条件的经济援助相结合的录取通知书时,应该考虑到成绩规定。所有人都说,他们没有。法学院应该透明地披露成绩规定对助学金可能产生的影响。大家都说,法学院不会这么做。如果没有外部胁迫,他们不太可能改变目前的做法。在缺乏行业标准的情况下,本文将尝试为法学院申请人提供数学工具,以评估成绩规定对其财务状况的实际影响。这篇文章首先提出了一个非常简单的模型,用于对未能坚持绩效规定的风险贴现经济援助奖励。它概述了一种简单的方法来计算经济援助奖励的预期价值,但须符合成绩规定。这篇文章还评估了一种特殊情况,在这种情况下,一所法学院已经含蓄地透露了它的盈亏平衡点——如果它不强加任何成绩规定,学校将授予的助学金数量。在这些基础上,本文对法学院成绩和功绩规定作为标准正态分布的工件进行了全面的分析。它执行三个不同的任务。本文定义了标准分数,并解释了法学院是如何根据每个学生的原始分数的标准分数与整体分布的平均值和标准差之间的关系来评分的。然后,本文用正态分布的累积分布函数描述不满足优点规定的风险。对于那些不满足某一学校成绩规定的风险已知的情况,本文演示了如何使用逆累积分布函数来估计学校成绩分布的均值和标准差。作为奖励,这最后的练习提供了对风险价值分析的介绍,这是评估全球资本市场风险的主要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信