A Curriculum Learning Approach for Pain Intensity Recognition from Facial Expressions

Adria Mallol-Ragolta, Shuo Liu, N. Cummins, Björn Schuller
{"title":"A Curriculum Learning Approach for Pain Intensity Recognition from Facial Expressions","authors":"Adria Mallol-Ragolta, Shuo Liu, N. Cummins, Björn Schuller","doi":"10.1109/FG47880.2020.00083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The high prevalence of chronic pain in society raises the need to develop new digital tools that can automatically and objectively assess pain intensity in individuals. These tools can contribute to an optimisation of clinical resources, as they offer cost-effective solutions for early detection, continuous monitoring, and treatment personalisation by utilising Artificial Intelligence techniques. In this work, we present our contribution to the Pain Intensity Estimation from Facial Expressions task of the EMOPAIN 2020 Challenge. Specifically, we compare the performance of Recurrent Neural Networks trained with standard or Curriculum Learning (CL) approaches to predict the pain intensity level of individuals reported in an 11-point scale from facial expressions. The results obtained using the test partition support the use of CL-based approaches in the automatic prediction of pain from facial features. The best model trained using a CL approach achieved a Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.196 in the test partition, while the model trained using a standard approach, without CL, achieved a CCC of 0.174. In terms of CCC, these results respectively represent an improvement of 0.136 and 0.114 on the best results of the baseline system reported by the Challenge organisers using the test partition.","PeriodicalId":238606,"journal":{"name":"2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 2020)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FG47880.2020.00083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The high prevalence of chronic pain in society raises the need to develop new digital tools that can automatically and objectively assess pain intensity in individuals. These tools can contribute to an optimisation of clinical resources, as they offer cost-effective solutions for early detection, continuous monitoring, and treatment personalisation by utilising Artificial Intelligence techniques. In this work, we present our contribution to the Pain Intensity Estimation from Facial Expressions task of the EMOPAIN 2020 Challenge. Specifically, we compare the performance of Recurrent Neural Networks trained with standard or Curriculum Learning (CL) approaches to predict the pain intensity level of individuals reported in an 11-point scale from facial expressions. The results obtained using the test partition support the use of CL-based approaches in the automatic prediction of pain from facial features. The best model trained using a CL approach achieved a Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.196 in the test partition, while the model trained using a standard approach, without CL, achieved a CCC of 0.174. In terms of CCC, these results respectively represent an improvement of 0.136 and 0.114 on the best results of the baseline system reported by the Challenge organisers using the test partition.
面部表情疼痛强度识别的课程学习方法
慢性疼痛在社会上的高流行率提出了开发新的数字工具的需要,可以自动和客观地评估个人的疼痛强度。这些工具有助于优化临床资源,因为它们通过利用人工智能技术为早期检测、持续监测和个性化治疗提供了具有成本效益的解决方案。在这项工作中,我们展示了我们对EMOPAIN 2020挑战的面部表情疼痛强度估计任务的贡献。具体来说,我们比较了使用标准或课程学习(CL)方法训练的递归神经网络的性能,以预测面部表情报告的11分制个体的疼痛强度水平。使用测试分区获得的结果支持使用基于cl的方法从面部特征自动预测疼痛。使用CL方法训练的最佳模型在测试分区中获得的一致性相关系数(CCC)为0.196,而使用标准方法训练的模型在不使用CL方法的情况下获得的CCC为0.174。就CCC而言,这些结果分别代表了挑战组织者使用测试分区报告的基线系统的最佳结果的0.136和0.114的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书