Energy Consumption Comparison of Current Powertrain Options in Autonomous Heavy Duty Vehicles (HDV)

S. Sigle, R. Hahn
{"title":"Energy Consumption Comparison of Current Powertrain Options in Autonomous Heavy Duty Vehicles (HDV)","authors":"S. Sigle, R. Hahn","doi":"10.1109/SMART55236.2022.9990489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows a simulative comparison of battery electric vehicle (BEV), fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) and internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) powertrains for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Furthermore, these powertrains will be developed as a cabin model and as an autonomous vehicle model. A commercial vehicle cycle is selected, which can be divided into urban, regional and highway subareas. From this, a daily cycle is created, which consists of these subareas. The different parameters of each simulation model consist of vehicle masses, auxiliary loads and vehicle resistances. In the final results, an improvement in energy consumption of an autonomously driving, electrified powertrain compared to a cab model in the regional and highway area of up to 5.5% is possible. The powertrain comparison shows the greatest energy savings potential for electrified powertrains in urban areas.","PeriodicalId":432948,"journal":{"name":"2022 Second International Conference on Sustainable Mobility Applications, Renewables and Technology (SMART)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Second International Conference on Sustainable Mobility Applications, Renewables and Technology (SMART)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMART55236.2022.9990489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper shows a simulative comparison of battery electric vehicle (BEV), fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) and internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) powertrains for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Furthermore, these powertrains will be developed as a cabin model and as an autonomous vehicle model. A commercial vehicle cycle is selected, which can be divided into urban, regional and highway subareas. From this, a daily cycle is created, which consists of these subareas. The different parameters of each simulation model consist of vehicle masses, auxiliary loads and vehicle resistances. In the final results, an improvement in energy consumption of an autonomously driving, electrified powertrain compared to a cab model in the regional and highway area of up to 5.5% is possible. The powertrain comparison shows the greatest energy savings potential for electrified powertrains in urban areas.
自动驾驶重型车辆(HDV)当前动力总成方案的能耗比较
本文对重型商用车用纯电动汽车(BEV)、燃料电池电动汽车(FCEV)和内燃机汽车(ICEV)动力系统进行了仿真比较。此外,这些动力系统将作为座舱模型和自动驾驶汽车模型开发。选取一个商用车周期,可分为城市、区域和公路三个子区域。由此,创建了一个每日循环,它由这些子区域组成。每个仿真模型的不同参数包括车辆质量、辅助载荷和车辆阻力。在最终结果中,在区域和高速公路区域,与出租车模型相比,自动驾驶电动动力系统的能耗可提高5.5%。动力系统对比显示,在城市地区,电动动力系统具有最大的节能潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信