Family as a Constitutional Value

Marcin Stębelski
{"title":"Family as a Constitutional Value","authors":"Marcin Stębelski","doi":"10.55019/plr.2022.1.85-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous constitutional references to “family” raise the question of how – at this level of sources of law – we should interpret this concept and what the consequences of adopting a specific interpretation of the constitutional foundations of family law are. The constitutional model of the family is an expression of a specific axiological choice that prefers the model of social relations based on the marriage between a woman and a man, and a stable and permanent community of parents and their children. The references to the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal show that the family is perceived as an important constitutional value. Its protection is meant to take measures to strengthen mutual relations between family members and to create conditions enabling them to exercise their mutual rights and obligations. It is therefore problematic for the legislator to use such definitions of the family which, in the process of their interpretation, identify it solely on the basis of the criterion of common household or income community. The financial support of the family must take into account the principle of subsidiarity. Therefore, it cannot lead to the granting of public funds to communities in which the basic obligations of family members are not fulfilled.","PeriodicalId":430761,"journal":{"name":"Pázmány Law Review","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pázmány Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55019/plr.2022.1.85-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous constitutional references to “family” raise the question of how – at this level of sources of law – we should interpret this concept and what the consequences of adopting a specific interpretation of the constitutional foundations of family law are. The constitutional model of the family is an expression of a specific axiological choice that prefers the model of social relations based on the marriage between a woman and a man, and a stable and permanent community of parents and their children. The references to the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Tribunal show that the family is perceived as an important constitutional value. Its protection is meant to take measures to strengthen mutual relations between family members and to create conditions enabling them to exercise their mutual rights and obligations. It is therefore problematic for the legislator to use such definitions of the family which, in the process of their interpretation, identify it solely on the basis of the criterion of common household or income community. The financial support of the family must take into account the principle of subsidiarity. Therefore, it cannot lead to the granting of public funds to communities in which the basic obligations of family members are not fulfilled.
家庭作为宪法价值
宪法中多次提到“家庭”,这就提出了一个问题,即在这一级的法律渊源上,我们应该如何解释这一概念,以及对家庭法的宪法基础作出具体解释的后果是什么。家庭的宪法模式表达了一种特定的价值论选择,这种选择倾向于以男女婚姻和父母及其子女组成的稳定和永久社区为基础的社会关系模式。提到宪法法庭的判例表明,家庭被视为一项重要的宪法价值。保护儿童的目的是采取措施,加强家庭成员之间的相互关系,创造条件,使他们能够行使相互的权利和义务。因此,立法者使用这样的家庭定义是有问题的,在其解释过程中,仅仅根据共同家庭或收入社区的标准来确定家庭。家庭的财政支助必须考虑到补助原则。因此,它不能导致向家庭成员的基本义务没有得到履行的社区提供公共资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信