Comparing SLIM, SPAR-H and Bayesian Network Methodologies

E. Calixto, G. B. A. Lima, P. Firmino
{"title":"Comparing SLIM, SPAR-H and Bayesian Network Methodologies","authors":"E. Calixto, G. B. A. Lima, P. Firmino","doi":"10.4236/OJSST.2013.32004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human factors always affect maintenance performance, and in \nsome cases, it’s critical to systems availability and reliability. \nDespite such importance, in so many cases, there’s no human \nreliability method applied to analyze maintenance tasks in \norder to understand better human factors influence in maintenance performance. \nThere are several human analysis methodologies and regarding human factors, \nSLIM (Successes Likelihood Methods), SPAR-H (Standardized Plant Analysis \nRisk-Human Reliability Analysis Method) and Bayesian Net take into account such \nfactors and may be a good approach to minimize human error. In order to propose \na human reliability methodology to analyze maintenance tasks taking into \naccount human factors, a case study about turbine star up tasks will be \ncarried out. Therefore, different human reliability methods will be performed \nbased on specialist opinion. Finally, the human error probability as well as \ndrawbacks and advantages from different methods will be discussed to get a \nfinal conclusion.","PeriodicalId":183634,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJSST.2013.32004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Human factors always affect maintenance performance, and in some cases, it’s critical to systems availability and reliability. Despite such importance, in so many cases, there’s no human reliability method applied to analyze maintenance tasks in order to understand better human factors influence in maintenance performance. There are several human analysis methodologies and regarding human factors, SLIM (Successes Likelihood Methods), SPAR-H (Standardized Plant Analysis Risk-Human Reliability Analysis Method) and Bayesian Net take into account such factors and may be a good approach to minimize human error. In order to propose a human reliability methodology to analyze maintenance tasks taking into account human factors, a case study about turbine star up tasks will be carried out. Therefore, different human reliability methods will be performed based on specialist opinion. Finally, the human error probability as well as drawbacks and advantages from different methods will be discussed to get a final conclusion.
比较SLIM、SPAR-H和贝叶斯网络方法
人为因素总是会影响维护性能,在某些情况下,这对系统的可用性和可靠性至关重要。尽管如此重要,但在许多情况下,并没有应用人为可靠性方法来分析维护任务,以便更好地理解人为因素对维护性能的影响。有几种人为分析方法和人为因素,SLIM(成功可能性方法),SPAR-H(标准化工厂分析风险-人类可靠性分析方法)和贝叶斯网络考虑到这些因素,可能是减少人为错误的好方法。为了提出一种考虑人为因素的维护任务分析的人的可靠性方法,本文将以汽轮机起动任务为例进行研究。因此,不同的人的可靠性方法将根据专家的意见执行。最后,讨论人为错误概率以及不同方法的优缺点,得出最终结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信