Adherence to a blended smoking cessation treatment

Lutz Siemer, M. Brusse-Keizer, M. Postel, S. B. Allouch, Angelos Patrinopoulos, R. Sanderman, M. Pieterse
{"title":"Adherence to a blended smoking cessation treatment","authors":"Lutz Siemer, M. Brusse-Keizer, M. Postel, S. B. Allouch, Angelos Patrinopoulos, R. Sanderman, M. Pieterse","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA1227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blended face-to-face and web-based treatment is a promising way to deliver smoking cessation therapy. Little is known about adherence to blended treatment and since adherence have been shown to be a measure for treatment’s acceptability and a determinant for treatment’s effectiveness, this study explores adherence to a blended smoking cessation treatment (BSCT). Patients’ (n=75) data were analyzed to trace adherence to BSCT delivered at an outpatient smoking cessation clinic. In total, 18 patient activities were selected to assess adherence. The minimum degree of adherence to these activities, for patients who reported abstinence at 6 months after treatment initiation, was used as threshold for adherence to BSCT. Finally, predictors for being adherent were studied out of 33 person-, smoking- and health-related baseline characteristics. Patients reporting abstinence, adhered to at least 61% of BSCT activities. Applying a 60% threshold, 18% of the patients were classified as adherent to BSCT. Marital status and social modelling were independent predictors for adherence. Patients having a partner had 11-times higher odds of being adherent (OR=11.3; CI: 1.33-98.99; p=0.03). While for social modeling – graded from 0 (partner and friends are not smoking) to 8 (partner and nearly all friends are smoking) – each unit increase was associated with 28% lower odds of being adherent (OR=0.72; CI: 0.55-0.94; p=0.02). The current study is the first study exploring adherence to a blended face-to-face and web-based smoking cessation treatment (BSCT) based on a substantial group of patients. It revealed a rather low adherence rate to BSCT. Furthermore, adherence was predicted by two baseline characteristics pertaining to patients’ social environment.","PeriodicalId":212819,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco, smoking control and health education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco, smoking control and health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA1227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Blended face-to-face and web-based treatment is a promising way to deliver smoking cessation therapy. Little is known about adherence to blended treatment and since adherence have been shown to be a measure for treatment’s acceptability and a determinant for treatment’s effectiveness, this study explores adherence to a blended smoking cessation treatment (BSCT). Patients’ (n=75) data were analyzed to trace adherence to BSCT delivered at an outpatient smoking cessation clinic. In total, 18 patient activities were selected to assess adherence. The minimum degree of adherence to these activities, for patients who reported abstinence at 6 months after treatment initiation, was used as threshold for adherence to BSCT. Finally, predictors for being adherent were studied out of 33 person-, smoking- and health-related baseline characteristics. Patients reporting abstinence, adhered to at least 61% of BSCT activities. Applying a 60% threshold, 18% of the patients were classified as adherent to BSCT. Marital status and social modelling were independent predictors for adherence. Patients having a partner had 11-times higher odds of being adherent (OR=11.3; CI: 1.33-98.99; p=0.03). While for social modeling – graded from 0 (partner and friends are not smoking) to 8 (partner and nearly all friends are smoking) – each unit increase was associated with 28% lower odds of being adherent (OR=0.72; CI: 0.55-0.94; p=0.02). The current study is the first study exploring adherence to a blended face-to-face and web-based smoking cessation treatment (BSCT) based on a substantial group of patients. It revealed a rather low adherence rate to BSCT. Furthermore, adherence was predicted by two baseline characteristics pertaining to patients’ social environment.
坚持混合戒烟治疗
面对面和基于网络的混合治疗是提供戒烟治疗的一种很有前途的方式。对混合治疗的依从性知之甚少,因为依从性已被证明是治疗可接受性和治疗有效性的决定因素,本研究探讨了对混合戒烟治疗(BSCT)的依从性。分析患者(n=75)的数据,以追踪在门诊戒烟诊所提供的BSCT的依从性。总共选择了18个患者活动来评估依从性。对于在治疗开始后6个月报告禁欲的患者,这些活动的最低坚持程度被用作BSCT坚持的阈值。最后,对33个与吸烟和健康相关的基线特征进行了预测。报告禁欲的患者坚持至少61%的BSCT活动。应用60%的阈值,18%的患者被归类为BSCT依从性。婚姻状况和社会模式是依从性的独立预测因素。有伴侣的患者坚持治疗的几率高出11倍(OR=11.3;置信区间:1.33—-98.99;p = 0.03)。而对于社交模式——从0(伴侣和朋友不吸烟)到8(伴侣和几乎所有朋友都吸烟)——每增加一个单位,坚持吸烟的几率就会降低28% (OR=0.72;置信区间:0.55—-0.94;p = 0.02)。目前的研究是第一个基于大量患者的探索面对面和基于网络的混合戒烟治疗(BSCT)依从性的研究。结果显示,BSCT的依从率相当低。此外,依从性通过与患者社会环境相关的两个基线特征来预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信