Political Will

J. Diamanti, Josh Robinson, Imre Szeman
{"title":"Political Will","authors":"J. Diamanti, Josh Robinson, Imre Szeman","doi":"10.1017/9781009008952.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The best way to address questions about emancipatory political practice, I think, is to pose them in terms of political will. Right away, this foregrounds the basic difference between the involuntary and the voluntary dimensions of social life, and thus helps reduce or transform the one in favor of the other. In every situation where it applies, it helps clarify a version of what I take to be the most important question of political practice: how can a dominated and coerced group or class of people free themselves from this coercion and acquire the power they need to determine their own course of action, consciously, deliberately, or “willingly,” in the face of the specific obstacles and resistance this course will confront?","PeriodicalId":233357,"journal":{"name":"Rebels and Conflict Escalation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rebels and Conflict Escalation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009008952.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The best way to address questions about emancipatory political practice, I think, is to pose them in terms of political will. Right away, this foregrounds the basic difference between the involuntary and the voluntary dimensions of social life, and thus helps reduce or transform the one in favor of the other. In every situation where it applies, it helps clarify a version of what I take to be the most important question of political practice: how can a dominated and coerced group or class of people free themselves from this coercion and acquire the power they need to determine their own course of action, consciously, deliberately, or “willingly,” in the face of the specific obstacles and resistance this course will confront?
政治意愿
我认为,解决关于解放性政治实践的问题的最好方法,就是从政治意愿的角度来提出这些问题。这样,社会生活的非自愿维度和自愿维度之间的基本区别就一目了然了,从而有助于减少或改变其中一个维度,从而有利于另一个维度。在任何适用的情况下,它都有助于澄清我认为是政治实践中最重要的问题的一个版本:一个被统治和强迫的群体或阶级如何从这种强迫中解脱出来,并获得他们需要的权力来决定他们自己的行动方针,有意识地,故意地,或“自愿地”,面对这一方针将面临的具体障碍和阻力?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信