Between Islam and Islamism

B. Tibi
{"title":"Between Islam and Islamism","authors":"B. Tibi","doi":"10.7765/9781526137623.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of broadening the scope of international relations (IR) and of the related field of security studies in light of the changed international system after the end of the Cold War, Islam and Islamic movements have moved to the fore of this discipline. At the surface it looks as if the study of the ‘geopolitics of Islam and the West’ has taken the place of the earlier Soviet studies (Fuller and Lesser, 1995). Students of IR concerned with the study of the Middle East and those who have turned to focus on Islamic civilization are caught, however, between a tremendously increasing Islamophobia in the West and the need to inquire into the threats to security by what is termed ‘Islamism’. Those who study Islamism while dealing with security are thus often challenged by the question: ‘Why then are you involving Islam in security studies? Isn’t this a part of Western Islamophobia?’ This chapter does not escape this challenge which has increased since September 11. The chapter begins by arguing that there are many different ways of responding to this question. Some scholars specializing in Islamic studies rightly question those efforts in the West that view Islam as a ‘threat’, a view which they qualify as perpetuating a myth (Esposito, 1992). They also deal with the question of the compatibility of Islam and democracy, and give a positive answer. In light of these answers we may doubt any inclusion of Islam in a study concerned with redefining security in the Middle East. But then we are intrigued by the rise of fundamentalist and rejectionist movements most hostile to the West and the Arab–Israeli peace process. It is true that when existing threats, violence and instability are related to Islamic movements there is a need for security studies to inquire into this issue. In redefining security in the Middle East after the end of the Cold War while also focusing on the peace process, we cannot escape looking at the events in which political Islam has become the ideology underpinning the rejection of peace and the promotion of anti-Western ideologies. This study, in doing so, takes as its point of departure the distinction between the religion of Islam and Islamism. 4","PeriodicalId":207993,"journal":{"name":"Redefining security in the Middle East","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Redefining security in the Middle East","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137623.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of broadening the scope of international relations (IR) and of the related field of security studies in light of the changed international system after the end of the Cold War, Islam and Islamic movements have moved to the fore of this discipline. At the surface it looks as if the study of the ‘geopolitics of Islam and the West’ has taken the place of the earlier Soviet studies (Fuller and Lesser, 1995). Students of IR concerned with the study of the Middle East and those who have turned to focus on Islamic civilization are caught, however, between a tremendously increasing Islamophobia in the West and the need to inquire into the threats to security by what is termed ‘Islamism’. Those who study Islamism while dealing with security are thus often challenged by the question: ‘Why then are you involving Islam in security studies? Isn’t this a part of Western Islamophobia?’ This chapter does not escape this challenge which has increased since September 11. The chapter begins by arguing that there are many different ways of responding to this question. Some scholars specializing in Islamic studies rightly question those efforts in the West that view Islam as a ‘threat’, a view which they qualify as perpetuating a myth (Esposito, 1992). They also deal with the question of the compatibility of Islam and democracy, and give a positive answer. In light of these answers we may doubt any inclusion of Islam in a study concerned with redefining security in the Middle East. But then we are intrigued by the rise of fundamentalist and rejectionist movements most hostile to the West and the Arab–Israeli peace process. It is true that when existing threats, violence and instability are related to Islamic movements there is a need for security studies to inquire into this issue. In redefining security in the Middle East after the end of the Cold War while also focusing on the peace process, we cannot escape looking at the events in which political Islam has become the ideology underpinning the rejection of peace and the promotion of anti-Western ideologies. This study, in doing so, takes as its point of departure the distinction between the religion of Islam and Islamism. 4
在伊斯兰教和伊斯兰主义之间
鉴于冷战结束后国际体系的变化,在扩大国际关系范围和安全研究相关领域的背景下,伊斯兰教和伊斯兰运动已走到这一学科的前列。从表面上看,似乎对“伊斯兰和西方地缘政治”的研究已经取代了早期苏联的研究(Fuller and Lesser, 1995)。然而,关注中东研究的国际关系专业学生和那些转而关注伊斯兰文明的学生,却陷入了西方日益增长的伊斯兰恐惧症和探究所谓“伊斯兰主义”对安全威胁的需要之间。因此,那些在研究安全问题的同时研究伊斯兰主义的人经常受到这样一个问题的挑战:“那你为什么要把伊斯兰教纳入安全研究?”这难道不是西方伊斯兰恐惧症的一部分吗?“这一章没有逃脱自9 / 11以来不断增加的挑战。本章一开始就提出,有许多不同的方式来回答这个问题。一些专门从事伊斯兰研究的学者对西方将伊斯兰视为“威胁”的努力提出了正确的质疑,他们认为这种观点延续了一个神话(埃斯波西托,1992)。他们还讨论了伊斯兰教和民主的兼容性问题,并给出了积极的答案。鉴于这些答案,我们可能会怀疑在重新定义中东安全的研究中是否会包括伊斯兰教。但是,我们对原教旨主义和拒绝主义运动的兴起很感兴趣,这些运动对西方和阿以和平进程最为敌视。确实,当现有的威胁、暴力和不稳定与伊斯兰运动有关时,就需要进行安全研究来调查这个问题。在冷战结束后重新定义中东安全的同时,同时也把重点放在和平进程上,我们不能不看到一些事件,在这些事件中,政治伊斯兰已成为支持拒绝和平和促进反西方意识形态的意识形态。在这样做的过程中,本研究以伊斯兰教和伊斯兰主义之间的区别为出发点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信