Alleviating Directional Well Trajectory Problems via Data Analytics

L. Clayton, Ming Hwa Lee, A. Salmachi
{"title":"Alleviating Directional Well Trajectory Problems via Data Analytics","authors":"L. Clayton, Ming Hwa Lee, A. Salmachi","doi":"10.2118/210766-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A consistent leading cause of drilling non-productive time (NPT) is the inability to steer the planned well trajectory trouble-free. Separate from downhole tool and drill bit failures, an unplanned trip to change the Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) is required for up to one in every seven drilling runs. Root cause analyses indicate potentially a quarter of all drilling NPT has poor planning or field execution as the failure mechanism, signifying scope for improvement. This paper aims to help guide optimal selection of RSS/motor and bit, to ensure challenging wellpaths will be achieved with minimal NPT associated with BHA trips.\n Directional drilling analysis typically compares dogleg severity (DLS) for planned and actual trajectory. This metric is fundamentally direction-blind; absolute tortuosity is represented whether planned or unintentional. Without full context, DLS analysis can mask many steering issues. Typically, industry software does not measure how closely the steering inputs match their anticipated responses during a run. Strategic management and identification of zones with erratic toolface control, or strong formation/BHA tendencies is critical.\n The proposed ‘derived steering’ analytics method was applied to plan demanding 3D trajectories for an Extended Reach offshore campaign in Australia. Existing minimum curvature equations were repurposed to plot previous runs steering inputs and then infer efficiencies for each formation. Supervision was essential to counteract strong consistent right-hand BHA walk tendency for all the variety of wells studied. Multiple NPT events on previous campaigns had resulted from poor steering response in the shallow interbedded geology.\n In view of quantifiable field-specific risks, wellplans were refined to minimize tortuosity and maximize the design safety factor. The combination of highest anticipated dogleg response rotary steerable technology and bit selection was selected for steering assurance. Modelled tendencies per lithology were shared with wellsite supervisors, and recent drilling results essentially mimicked data analytics.\n Others operating in this field in the 21st century had drilled total meterage of 36,740m MD from 83 runs. Bit Gradings showed two ‘Lost in Holes’, one ‘Drill String Failure’, six trips for ‘Downhole Tool Failures’, seven for ‘Penetration Rate’, six to ‘Change BHA’, two for ‘Hole Problems’ and one for ‘Downhole Motor Failure’. The current campaign's improved directional drilling offset analysis contributed towards significant avoidance of well delivery NPT to drill 28,061m in 34 runs. No trips were required to change BHA or bit because of inability to follow the trajectory, and field teams were able to pre-empt lithology-specific challenges.","PeriodicalId":151564,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, October 17, 2022","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, October 17, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210766-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A consistent leading cause of drilling non-productive time (NPT) is the inability to steer the planned well trajectory trouble-free. Separate from downhole tool and drill bit failures, an unplanned trip to change the Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) is required for up to one in every seven drilling runs. Root cause analyses indicate potentially a quarter of all drilling NPT has poor planning or field execution as the failure mechanism, signifying scope for improvement. This paper aims to help guide optimal selection of RSS/motor and bit, to ensure challenging wellpaths will be achieved with minimal NPT associated with BHA trips. Directional drilling analysis typically compares dogleg severity (DLS) for planned and actual trajectory. This metric is fundamentally direction-blind; absolute tortuosity is represented whether planned or unintentional. Without full context, DLS analysis can mask many steering issues. Typically, industry software does not measure how closely the steering inputs match their anticipated responses during a run. Strategic management and identification of zones with erratic toolface control, or strong formation/BHA tendencies is critical. The proposed ‘derived steering’ analytics method was applied to plan demanding 3D trajectories for an Extended Reach offshore campaign in Australia. Existing minimum curvature equations were repurposed to plot previous runs steering inputs and then infer efficiencies for each formation. Supervision was essential to counteract strong consistent right-hand BHA walk tendency for all the variety of wells studied. Multiple NPT events on previous campaigns had resulted from poor steering response in the shallow interbedded geology. In view of quantifiable field-specific risks, wellplans were refined to minimize tortuosity and maximize the design safety factor. The combination of highest anticipated dogleg response rotary steerable technology and bit selection was selected for steering assurance. Modelled tendencies per lithology were shared with wellsite supervisors, and recent drilling results essentially mimicked data analytics. Others operating in this field in the 21st century had drilled total meterage of 36,740m MD from 83 runs. Bit Gradings showed two ‘Lost in Holes’, one ‘Drill String Failure’, six trips for ‘Downhole Tool Failures’, seven for ‘Penetration Rate’, six to ‘Change BHA’, two for ‘Hole Problems’ and one for ‘Downhole Motor Failure’. The current campaign's improved directional drilling offset analysis contributed towards significant avoidance of well delivery NPT to drill 28,061m in 34 runs. No trips were required to change BHA or bit because of inability to follow the trajectory, and field teams were able to pre-empt lithology-specific challenges.
通过数据分析解决定向井轨迹问题
钻进非生产时间(NPT)的一个主要原因是无法无故障地控制计划井眼轨迹。除了井下工具和钻头故障外,每7趟钻中就需要更换一次底部钻具组合(BHA)。根本原因分析表明,可能有四分之一的钻井NPT是由于计划或现场执行不当造成的,这表明存在改进的空间。本文旨在帮助指导RSS/马达和钻头的最佳选择,以确保以最小的NPT和BHA起下钻实现具有挑战性的井眼。定向钻井分析通常比较计划和实际轨迹的狗腿严重程度(DLS)。这个指标基本上是方向盲的;绝对扭曲表现为有意或无意。如果没有完整的上下文,DLS分析可能会掩盖许多转向问题。通常情况下,工业软件不会测量在运行过程中转向输入与预期响应的匹配程度。工具面控制不稳定或地层/底部钻具组合倾向强烈的区域的战略管理和识别至关重要。提出的“衍生导向”分析方法被应用于澳大利亚海上延伸作业的3D轨迹规划。现有的最小曲率方程被重新用于绘制以前的转向输入,然后推断每个地层的效率。对于所研究的所有类型的井来说,为了防止BHA右侧行走的趋势,监督是至关重要的。在之前的作业中,多次NPT事件都是由于浅层互层地质条件下转向响应差造成的。考虑到可量化的油田特定风险,我们对井方案进行了改进,以最大限度地减少弯曲度,最大限度地提高设计安全系数。选择了最高狗腿响应旋转导向技术和钻头选择的组合来保证转向。每个岩性的建模趋势与井场监督员共享,最近的钻井结果基本上模拟了数据分析。在21世纪,在该领域作业的其他公司共进行了83次钻井,总钻井面积为36740米。钻头分级显示有2次“井内丢失”,1次“钻柱失效”,6次“井下工具失效”,7次“钻速”,6次“更换BHA”,2次“井眼问题”,1次“井下马达故障”。目前的作业改进了定向钻井偏移分析,在34趟入井中钻了28,061米,大大避免了井的交付NPT。由于无法跟随轨迹,无需下入更换BHA或钻头,现场团队能够预先解决特定岩性的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信