Fundamental Basket Size Patterns and Their Relation to Retailer Performance

James Martin, M. Nenycz-Thiel, J. Dawes, Arry Tanusondjaja, Justin Cohen, B. McColl
{"title":"Fundamental Basket Size Patterns and Their Relation to Retailer Performance","authors":"James Martin, M. Nenycz-Thiel, J. Dawes, Arry Tanusondjaja, Justin Cohen, B. McColl","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3396827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses a sample of approximately 60,000 US households to document fundamental shopping basket size patterns across a range of retail types, and examines them in relation to retailer performance metrics (unit sales and dollar revenue). Specifically, this research addresses two main questions: 1) how do shopping basket metrics (mean and median number of items, the distribution of one, two, three … n items) differ by retail type, and 2) how does the Pareto ratio (sales generated by the heaviest 20%, and lightest 80% of buyers) apply to shopping baskets. The results show that basket size patterns in retailers are predictable. Shoppers purchase more items on average in retailers that offer a greater variety of items, and the distribution of basket sizes follows the Poisson lognormal model. The results also show that the largest 20% of shopping baskets on average generate 50% of unit sales, and 40% of dollar revenue. These results set additional benchmarks of the patterns that can be expected when looking at data on a basket-level. This research offers implications to practitioners by showing the importance of small and large baskets for retailer revenue and growth, which can guide more informed decision making to better manage their stores and brands.","PeriodicalId":134754,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Consumer Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Consumer Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3396827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This study uses a sample of approximately 60,000 US households to document fundamental shopping basket size patterns across a range of retail types, and examines them in relation to retailer performance metrics (unit sales and dollar revenue). Specifically, this research addresses two main questions: 1) how do shopping basket metrics (mean and median number of items, the distribution of one, two, three … n items) differ by retail type, and 2) how does the Pareto ratio (sales generated by the heaviest 20%, and lightest 80% of buyers) apply to shopping baskets. The results show that basket size patterns in retailers are predictable. Shoppers purchase more items on average in retailers that offer a greater variety of items, and the distribution of basket sizes follows the Poisson lognormal model. The results also show that the largest 20% of shopping baskets on average generate 50% of unit sales, and 40% of dollar revenue. These results set additional benchmarks of the patterns that can be expected when looking at data on a basket-level. This research offers implications to practitioners by showing the importance of small and large baskets for retailer revenue and growth, which can guide more informed decision making to better manage their stores and brands.
基本购物篮大小模式及其与零售商绩效的关系
本研究使用了大约60,000个美国家庭的样本,记录了一系列零售类型的基本购物篮大小模式,并检查了它们与零售商绩效指标(单位销售额和美元收入)的关系。具体来说,本研究解决了两个主要问题:1)购物篮指标(商品的平均数和中位数,1、2、3个€…商品的分布)如何因零售类型而异;2)帕累托比率(最重的20%和最轻的80%的买家产生的销售额)如何适用于购物篮。结果表明,零售商的篮子尺寸模式是可预测的。购物者在提供更多种类商品的零售商中平均购买更多的商品,并且购物篮大小的分布遵循泊松对数正态模型。调查结果还显示,最大的20%的购物篮平均创造了50%的单位销售额和40%的美元收入。这些结果为在篮子级别上查看数据时可以预期的模式设置了额外的基准。这项研究通过展示小篮子和大篮子对零售商收入和增长的重要性,为从业者提供了启示,这可以指导更明智的决策,以更好地管理他们的商店和品牌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信