Molyneux’s Question Within and Across the Senses

John Schwenkler
{"title":"Molyneux’s Question Within and Across the Senses","authors":"John Schwenkler","doi":"10.4324/9781315146935-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On a first pass it may seem that contemporary philosophers’ answers to this question should break down neatly according to their views of the metaphysics of perceptual experience, as follows. If perception is a presentation or representation of external objects and their properties, then since shape is a property that can be perceived through vision and touch alike, there should be no need for an associative process before a person can identify shapes that are presented or represented through sight as the same as those that are presented or represented through touch. By contrast, if perceptual experience consists in qualia or internal sensations, then since the qualitative character of visual experience is so different from that of the experience of the world through touch, we should not expect the identity of what is seen with what is touched to be transparent to a naïve perceiver.","PeriodicalId":287226,"journal":{"name":"Spatial Senses","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial Senses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146935-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

On a first pass it may seem that contemporary philosophers’ answers to this question should break down neatly according to their views of the metaphysics of perceptual experience, as follows. If perception is a presentation or representation of external objects and their properties, then since shape is a property that can be perceived through vision and touch alike, there should be no need for an associative process before a person can identify shapes that are presented or represented through sight as the same as those that are presented or represented through touch. By contrast, if perceptual experience consists in qualia or internal sensations, then since the qualitative character of visual experience is so different from that of the experience of the world through touch, we should not expect the identity of what is seen with what is touched to be transparent to a naïve perceiver.
关于Molyneux的问题
乍一看,当代哲学家对这个问题的回答似乎应该按照他们对感性经验的形而上学的看法,整齐地分解如下。如果感知是外部物体及其属性的呈现或表征,那么既然形状是一种可以通过视觉和触觉感知的属性,那么在一个人能够识别通过视觉呈现或表征的形状与通过触觉呈现或表征的形状之前,就不需要联想过程了。相比之下,如果知觉经验是由感觉或内在感觉组成的,那么由于视觉经验的质量特征与通过触摸的世界经验是如此不同,我们不应该期望看到的东西和触摸的东西的身份对naïve感知者是透明的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信