Design and Preliminary Testing of a Quadleaflet ePTFE Pediatric Prosthetic Heart Valve

Libby H. Welborn, Anna K. Himes, Ida E. Greenlee, Nyna J. DeWitt, Ava T. Burgess, Brandon K. Eberl, O. Pierrakos
{"title":"Design and Preliminary Testing of a Quadleaflet ePTFE Pediatric Prosthetic Heart Valve","authors":"Libby H. Welborn, Anna K. Himes, Ida E. Greenlee, Nyna J. DeWitt, Ava T. Burgess, Brandon K. Eberl, O. Pierrakos","doi":"10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, congenital heart defects affect nearly 40,000 births each year and often will require heart valve replacement [1]. Viable prosthetic heart valve options are limited for pediatric patients that need a valve smaller than 16mm in diameter. When commercially available valve sizes are not available, surgeons often handcraft a valve using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) to fabricate a valve that is small enough to meet the size constraints of young pediatric patients. There is limited published hemodynamic data for ePTFE valves. A comparison between the two ePTFE handmade valves (trileaflet and quadleaflet) demonstrated hemodynamic differences in regurgitation due to leaflet number. The handmade valves both showed increased regurgitation compared to a Carbomedics valve (commercially available design). Regurgitation had varying effects on pressure gradients and cardiac output. The aim of this paper is to: 1) showcase the design process of a quadleaflet ePTFE valved conduit with a diameter of 16mm or less and 2) offer a hemodynamic performance comparison.","PeriodicalId":286724,"journal":{"name":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds55548.2022.9799312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the United States, congenital heart defects affect nearly 40,000 births each year and often will require heart valve replacement [1]. Viable prosthetic heart valve options are limited for pediatric patients that need a valve smaller than 16mm in diameter. When commercially available valve sizes are not available, surgeons often handcraft a valve using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) to fabricate a valve that is small enough to meet the size constraints of young pediatric patients. There is limited published hemodynamic data for ePTFE valves. A comparison between the two ePTFE handmade valves (trileaflet and quadleaflet) demonstrated hemodynamic differences in regurgitation due to leaflet number. The handmade valves both showed increased regurgitation compared to a Carbomedics valve (commercially available design). Regurgitation had varying effects on pressure gradients and cardiac output. The aim of this paper is to: 1) showcase the design process of a quadleaflet ePTFE valved conduit with a diameter of 16mm or less and 2) offer a hemodynamic performance comparison.
四瓣ePTFE儿童人工心脏瓣膜的设计与初步试验
在美国,先天性心脏缺陷每年影响近4万新生儿,通常需要心脏瓣膜置换术[1]。对于需要直径小于16毫米瓣膜的儿科患者,可行的人工心脏瓣膜选择是有限的。当市面上没有瓣膜尺寸时,外科医生通常使用膨胀聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)手工制作一个足够小的瓣膜,以满足年轻儿科患者的尺寸限制。已发表的ePTFE瓣膜的血流动力学数据有限。两种ePTFE手工瓣膜(三叶瓣和四叶瓣)的比较表明,由于小叶数的不同,反流的血流动力学差异。与碳素瓣膜(市售设计)相比,手工瓣膜的反流都增加了。反流对压力梯度和心输出量有不同的影响。本文的目的是:1)展示直径为16mm或以下的四瓣ePTFE带阀导管的设计过程,2)提供血流动力学性能比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信