Emotion

The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies Pub Date : 2019-10-22 DOI:10.4324/9780429445637-11

J. Brauer, M. Lücke

{"title":"Emotion","authors":"J. Brauer, M. Lücke","doi":"10.4324/9780429445637-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deﬁnition of the problem The discourse about affective and social robotics in the realm of nursing can actually be regarded as an expression of technological solutionism rather than an accurate description of nursing reality. From an ethical perspective, it is therefore less urgent to answer questions about an ethical evaluation of already implemented robots. Arguments Instead of reacting to the circulating visions, it is necessary to analyze the role robots are attributed in these visions and to expound the normative aspects, which should be taken into consideration in the construction process. Therefore, the article proposes elements of an ethical and anthropological realm of reﬂection, naming crucial aspects to be taken into further consideration before or during the construction and implementation process. In order to enable sound ethical evaluation, a ﬁve-dimensional heuristic (emotion, interaction, context, agent, actant) is proposed allowing an informed analysis of the situation and the proposed human–machine interaction by structuring the reﬂection. Conclusion Based on this kind of empirically informed description, implementable technical solutions can be constructed or already constructed robots can be evaluated ethically.","PeriodicalId":168143,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429445637-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deﬁnition of the problem The discourse about affective and social robotics in the realm of nursing can actually be regarded as an expression of technological solutionism rather than an accurate description of nursing reality. From an ethical perspective, it is therefore less urgent to answer questions about an ethical evaluation of already implemented robots. Arguments Instead of reacting to the circulating visions, it is necessary to analyze the role robots are attributed in these visions and to expound the normative aspects, which should be taken into consideration in the construction process. Therefore, the article proposes elements of an ethical and anthropological realm of reﬂection, naming crucial aspects to be taken into further consideration before or during the construction and implementation process. In order to enable sound ethical evaluation, a ﬁve-dimensional heuristic (emotion, interaction, context, agent, actant) is proposed allowing an informed analysis of the situation and the proposed human–machine interaction by structuring the reﬂection. Conclusion Based on this kind of empirically informed description, implementable technical solutions can be constructed or already constructed robots can be evaluated ethically.

查看原文本刊更多论文

情感

关于护理领域的情感和社会机器人的论述实际上可以被视为技术解决方案主义的表达，而不是对护理现实的准确描述。因此，从伦理的角度来看，回答关于已经实施的机器人的伦理评估的问题并不那么紧迫。与其对流传的愿景做出反应，我们有必要分析机器人在这些愿景中所扮演的角色，并阐述在建设过程中应该考虑的规范性方面。因此，本文提出了伦理和人类学反思领域的要素，指出了在建设和实施过程之前或过程中需要进一步考虑的关键方面。为了进行合理的伦理评估，提出了一种五维启发式(情感、交互、上下文、代理、代理人)，通过构建反射，允许对情况和提议的人机交互进行知情分析。基于这种基于经验的描述，可以构建可实施的技术解决方案，或者可以对已经构建的机器人进行伦理评估。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies

自引率

0.00%

发文量