Comparison of Immunofluorescence Assays Results for Diagnosis of Rickettsial Diseases Using Direct Serum and Filter Paper Serum Spots

Afroza Akbar Sweety, S. Munshi, M. Z. Hossain, B. Islam, S. Tabassum, Imtiaz Ahmed, Shahjalal Khan, A. Khan, K. A. Azad
{"title":"Comparison of Immunofluorescence Assays Results for Diagnosis of Rickettsial Diseases Using Direct Serum and Filter Paper Serum Spots","authors":"Afroza Akbar Sweety, S. Munshi, M. Z. Hossain, B. Islam, S. Tabassum, Imtiaz Ahmed, Shahjalal Khan, A. Khan, K. A. Azad","doi":"10.3329/JDMC.V28I2.51150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rickettsial diseases are difficult to diagnose in Bangladesh due to low index of suspicion and lack of diagnostic facilities in most laboratories especially in rural areas. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is the gold standard serological test for diagnosis of Rickettsial diseases. For serological diagnosis of rickettsial diseases, use of filter paper is an inexpensive and convenient method for collecting, storing, and transporting of blood samples with little space without refrigeration. Current study shows that the rickettsial diseases were present in febrile patients in Bangladesh. The study also compared the results of direct serum by IFA and filter paper serum spot followed by IFA as an alternative way of testing frozen samples. Materials and Methods: This observational study for evaluation of rickettsial diseases from direct serum by IFA and sera dried on blotting paper followed by IFA at the department of Virology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 152 patients’ sera were selected by systemic random sampling of every 3 sera of 556 febrile patients who were tested negative for dengue and or Chikungunya virus infection. Forty cases were confirmed by IFA from direct sera. In addition, 60 samples were selected from 152 sera by systemic random sampling of every 3 sera for blotting on filter paper for further IFA test. Out of 60 sera, 35 were confirmed by IFA from direct sera and of the 35 confirmed positive cases, 31(88.6%) were positive by IFA after blotting paper assay. Taking the IFA of direct sera as gold standard test, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of IFA from blotting paper eluted sera were 88%, 100%, 100% and 86% respectively. Conclusion: The study showed the use of filter paper is an inexpensive and convenient method for storing and transporting samples for serological tests like IFA in diagnosis of rickettsial diseases.","PeriodicalId":320976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/JDMC.V28I2.51150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rickettsial diseases are difficult to diagnose in Bangladesh due to low index of suspicion and lack of diagnostic facilities in most laboratories especially in rural areas. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is the gold standard serological test for diagnosis of Rickettsial diseases. For serological diagnosis of rickettsial diseases, use of filter paper is an inexpensive and convenient method for collecting, storing, and transporting of blood samples with little space without refrigeration. Current study shows that the rickettsial diseases were present in febrile patients in Bangladesh. The study also compared the results of direct serum by IFA and filter paper serum spot followed by IFA as an alternative way of testing frozen samples. Materials and Methods: This observational study for evaluation of rickettsial diseases from direct serum by IFA and sera dried on blotting paper followed by IFA at the department of Virology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 152 patients’ sera were selected by systemic random sampling of every 3 sera of 556 febrile patients who were tested negative for dengue and or Chikungunya virus infection. Forty cases were confirmed by IFA from direct sera. In addition, 60 samples were selected from 152 sera by systemic random sampling of every 3 sera for blotting on filter paper for further IFA test. Out of 60 sera, 35 were confirmed by IFA from direct sera and of the 35 confirmed positive cases, 31(88.6%) were positive by IFA after blotting paper assay. Taking the IFA of direct sera as gold standard test, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of IFA from blotting paper eluted sera were 88%, 100%, 100% and 86% respectively. Conclusion: The study showed the use of filter paper is an inexpensive and convenient method for storing and transporting samples for serological tests like IFA in diagnosis of rickettsial diseases.
直接血清与滤纸血清斑点免疫荧光检测立克次体病诊断结果的比较
背景:立克次体病在孟加拉国很难诊断,因为怀疑指数低,而且大多数实验室缺乏诊断设施,特别是在农村地区。免疫荧光试验(IFA)是诊断立克次体病的金标准血清学试验。对于立克次体病的血清学诊断,使用滤纸是一种廉价和方便的方法,用于收集、储存和运输血液样本,空间小,无需冷藏。目前的研究表明,立克次体病存在于孟加拉国的发热病人中。本研究还比较了IFA直接血清法和滤纸血清斑点法检测冷冻样品的结果。材料和方法:本观察性研究在孟加拉国达卡的Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学(BSMMU)病毒学部门用IFA和用印迹纸干燥的血清评价立克次体病。通过对556名登革热和/或基孔肯雅病毒感染检测呈阴性的发热患者每3份血清进行系统随机抽样,共抽取152名患者的血清。直接血清IFA确诊40例。另外,从152份血清中系统随机抽取60份样品,每3份样品用滤纸印迹,进一步进行IFA检测。60份血清中有35份经直接血清检测为IFA, 35例确诊阳性病例中有31例(88.6%)经印迹纸检测为IFA阳性。以直接血清IFA为金标准试验,印迹纸洗脱血清IFA的敏感性为88%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为86%。结论:在立克次体病诊断中,使用滤纸进行IFA等血清学检测是一种廉价、便捷的样品储存和运输方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信