Environmental life cycle assessment of an integrated biosolids microsieving-drying-gasification pilot plant from WWTP

D. Fernández‐Gutiérrez, A. Manali, Konstantinos Tsamoutsoglou, P. Gikas, Andrés Lara Guillén
{"title":"Environmental life cycle assessment of an integrated biosolids microsieving-drying-gasification pilot plant from WWTP","authors":"D. Fernández‐Gutiérrez, A. Manali, Konstantinos Tsamoutsoglou, P. Gikas, Andrés Lara Guillén","doi":"10.47248/ges2303030004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The daily use of water causes its degradation and must be reclaimed to protect the environment. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have environmental burdens associated with energy consumption and sludge management. These burdens are linked, for instance, to energy consumption and sludge management. To diminish the environmental impact of the WWTPs, solutions like the developed one in the LIFE B2E4sustainable-WWTP project (B2E) arose. The B2E solution seeks to decrease some of the WWTP burdens by managing \nin situ the sludge generated in the WWTP through a gasification stage, valorising the syngas obtained in a cogeneration engine to produce both thermal and electrical energy. This reduces both the environmental impacts and costs derived from the sludge treatment by an external entity, being a self-sustainable solution in terms of energy. The B2E solution is designed for midsize WWTPs (10,000 and 100,000 PE), the majority of the European WWTPs.\nMethods: The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was selected to evaluate the environmental performance of the B2E system. Six impact categories were analysed under the environmental footprint methodology (EF 3.0): climate change, freshwater ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, human toxicity (cancer and non-cancer) and resource use (fossils). \nTo check if the B2E solution reduced the environmental burdens, \na comparison with a baseline (BS) system, typically implemented in midsize WWTPs, was performed.\nResults: The B2E system showed an environmental improvement compared to the BS in the six studied impact categories. The largest difference was observed in both human toxicity (cancer and non-cancer) impact categories. Their impacts were 99% lower compared to the BS. The reduction of the environmental impact for the rest of the categories ranged between 19% and 48%.\nConclusions: These results demonstrate from an environmental point of view that the B2E system has the potential to be implemented in midsize WWTPs in the near future. However, the technology should confirm these results under an operational environment to test the whole system by obtaining only representative primary data, which would enable future implementation strategies towards more efficient and sustainable WWTPs.","PeriodicalId":447585,"journal":{"name":"Green Energy and Sustainability","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Energy and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47248/ges2303030004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The daily use of water causes its degradation and must be reclaimed to protect the environment. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have environmental burdens associated with energy consumption and sludge management. These burdens are linked, for instance, to energy consumption and sludge management. To diminish the environmental impact of the WWTPs, solutions like the developed one in the LIFE B2E4sustainable-WWTP project (B2E) arose. The B2E solution seeks to decrease some of the WWTP burdens by managing in situ the sludge generated in the WWTP through a gasification stage, valorising the syngas obtained in a cogeneration engine to produce both thermal and electrical energy. This reduces both the environmental impacts and costs derived from the sludge treatment by an external entity, being a self-sustainable solution in terms of energy. The B2E solution is designed for midsize WWTPs (10,000 and 100,000 PE), the majority of the European WWTPs. Methods: The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was selected to evaluate the environmental performance of the B2E system. Six impact categories were analysed under the environmental footprint methodology (EF 3.0): climate change, freshwater ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, human toxicity (cancer and non-cancer) and resource use (fossils). To check if the B2E solution reduced the environmental burdens, a comparison with a baseline (BS) system, typically implemented in midsize WWTPs, was performed. Results: The B2E system showed an environmental improvement compared to the BS in the six studied impact categories. The largest difference was observed in both human toxicity (cancer and non-cancer) impact categories. Their impacts were 99% lower compared to the BS. The reduction of the environmental impact for the rest of the categories ranged between 19% and 48%. Conclusions: These results demonstrate from an environmental point of view that the B2E system has the potential to be implemented in midsize WWTPs in the near future. However, the technology should confirm these results under an operational environment to test the whole system by obtaining only representative primary data, which would enable future implementation strategies towards more efficient and sustainable WWTPs.
污水处理厂生物固体微筛-干燥-气化一体化中试装置的环境生命周期评价
背景:水的日常使用导致其退化,必须回收以保护环境。污水处理厂(WWTPs)具有与能源消耗和污泥管理相关的环境负担。例如,这些负担与能源消耗和污泥管理有关。为了减少污水处理厂对环境的影响,出现了LIFE b2e4可持续污水处理厂项目(B2E)中开发的解决方案。B2E解决方案旨在通过气化阶段就地管理污水处理厂产生的污泥,从而减少污水处理厂的一些负担,从而使热电联产发动机获得的合成气产生热能和电能。这既减少了对环境的影响,也减少了由外部实体处理污泥的成本,在能源方面是一种自我可持续的解决方案。B2E解决方案是为中型污水处理厂(10,000和100,000 PE)设计的,这是欧洲大多数污水处理厂。方法:采用生命周期评价法(LCA)对B2E系统的环境绩效进行评价。根据环境足迹方法(EF 3.0)分析了六个影响类别:气候变化、淡水生态毒性、淡水富营养化、人类毒性(癌症和非癌症)和资源利用(化石)。为了检查B2E解决方案是否减轻了环境负担,与通常在中型污水处理厂实施的基线(BS)系统进行了比较。结果:在研究的六个影响类别中,B2E系统比BS系统在环境方面有所改善。在人类毒性(癌症和非癌症)影响类别中观察到最大的差异。与BS相比,它们的影响降低了99%。其余类别的环境影响减少幅度在19%至48%之间。结论:从环境的角度来看,这些结果表明,在不久的将来,B2E系统有可能在中型污水处理厂实施。但是,该技术应通过只获得具有代表性的原始数据,在测试整个系统的操作环境下确认这些结果,这将使未来的执行战略能够实现更有效和可持续的污水处理厂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信