Framing Shakespeare in New Digital Canons: Paratextual Conventions of RSC Live and NT Live

Beth Sharrock
{"title":"Framing Shakespeare in New Digital Canons: Paratextual Conventions of RSC Live and NT Live","authors":"Beth Sharrock","doi":"10.1353/shb.2022.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article develops an analysis of the relationship between paratextual framing and institutional identity in the body of productions broadcast to cinemas by RSC Live and NT Live, proposing that paratexts are an integral yet consistently overlooked mediator of meaning in Shakespearean live theater broadcasts. Since the National Theatre’s broadcast of All’s Well that End’s Well in 2009 and the Royal Shakespeare Company’s debut live theater broadcast of Richard II in 2013, Shakespearean performance has dominated the UK’s event cinema market. This article examines the interpretive significance of paratextual conventions developed by these two companies in negotiating institutional identity and shaping narratives of Shakespeare’s cultural value. It brings these marginal materials to the center of critical analysis, proposing an original critical vocabulary by which to examine the diversity of the broadcast paratexts which have developed around, and been shaped by, Shakespearean performance in the medium. A sustained analysis of the frames of interpretation offered in Shakespearean broadcast performances exposes the interpretive labor these marginal materials regularly perform, highlighting the value of analyzing Shakespearean live theater broadcasts holistically.","PeriodicalId":304234,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare Bulletin","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2022.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article develops an analysis of the relationship between paratextual framing and institutional identity in the body of productions broadcast to cinemas by RSC Live and NT Live, proposing that paratexts are an integral yet consistently overlooked mediator of meaning in Shakespearean live theater broadcasts. Since the National Theatre’s broadcast of All’s Well that End’s Well in 2009 and the Royal Shakespeare Company’s debut live theater broadcast of Richard II in 2013, Shakespearean performance has dominated the UK’s event cinema market. This article examines the interpretive significance of paratextual conventions developed by these two companies in negotiating institutional identity and shaping narratives of Shakespeare’s cultural value. It brings these marginal materials to the center of critical analysis, proposing an original critical vocabulary by which to examine the diversity of the broadcast paratexts which have developed around, and been shaped by, Shakespearean performance in the medium. A sustained analysis of the frames of interpretation offered in Shakespearean broadcast performances exposes the interpretive labor these marginal materials regularly perform, highlighting the value of analyzing Shakespearean live theater broadcasts holistically.
在新的数字标准中构建莎士比亚:RSC Live和NT Live的超文本约定
摘要:本文分析了RSC Live和NT Live在电影院播放的作品中,副文本框架与制度认同之间的关系,提出副文本是莎士比亚戏剧现场直播中不可或缺但却一直被忽视的意义中介。自2009年国家剧院播出《皆大皆非》和2013年皇家莎士比亚剧团首次现场直播《理查二世》以来,莎士比亚戏剧一直主导着英国的活动影院市场。本文考察了这两家公司在协商制度认同和塑造莎士比亚文化价值叙事方面所形成的文本公约的解释意义。它将这些边缘材料带到批判性分析的中心,提出了一种原始的批判性词汇,通过这种词汇来研究广播文本的多样性,这些文本是围绕莎士比亚在媒体上的表演而发展起来的,并被其塑造。对莎剧直播表演中提供的阐释框架的持续分析揭示了这些边缘材料经常进行的阐释劳动,凸显了整体分析莎剧直播的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信