Optimizing visual comfort and classification accuracy for a hybrid P300-SSVEP brain-computer interface

Minpeng Xu, Jin Han, Yijun Wang, Dong Ming
{"title":"Optimizing visual comfort and classification accuracy for a hybrid P300-SSVEP brain-computer interface","authors":"Minpeng Xu, Jin Han, Yijun Wang, Dong Ming","doi":"10.1109/NER.2017.8008365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have achieved great progress in speed recently. But the problem of visual fatigue caused by intense flashes poses a great challenge in designing practical systems for long-term use. A direct way to improve visual comfort is to reduce the stimulus contrast. But it could also weaken the featured evoked potentials, which would bring a negative impact on system accuracy. Thus it's significant to figure out the optimal contrast that could have both high visual comfort and high accuracy. This study investigated the effects of different stimulus contrasts on the two aspects. Six hybrid P300-SSVEP spellers were developed with different stimulus contrasts. Three subjects spelled 10 same characters offline for each speller. After each spelling subjects were asked to grade the flashes they just met in terms of visual comfort. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis (SWLDA) was used to recognize the P300 potential; the filter bank canonical correlation analysis (FBCCA) with individual template was adopted to classify the SSVEP. A decision fusion was performed to recognize the target. The results showed that, compared with P300 or SSVEP only features, the hybrid features significantly improved the accuracy. The subjects felt more comfortable for contrasts below 25%. The classification accuracy wouldn't have a great loss unless the contrast was below 12%. Taken together, the optimal contrast was 12% for the hybrid P300-SSVEP BCI system in this study.","PeriodicalId":142883,"journal":{"name":"2017 8th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 8th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NER.2017.8008365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Visual brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have achieved great progress in speed recently. But the problem of visual fatigue caused by intense flashes poses a great challenge in designing practical systems for long-term use. A direct way to improve visual comfort is to reduce the stimulus contrast. But it could also weaken the featured evoked potentials, which would bring a negative impact on system accuracy. Thus it's significant to figure out the optimal contrast that could have both high visual comfort and high accuracy. This study investigated the effects of different stimulus contrasts on the two aspects. Six hybrid P300-SSVEP spellers were developed with different stimulus contrasts. Three subjects spelled 10 same characters offline for each speller. After each spelling subjects were asked to grade the flashes they just met in terms of visual comfort. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis (SWLDA) was used to recognize the P300 potential; the filter bank canonical correlation analysis (FBCCA) with individual template was adopted to classify the SSVEP. A decision fusion was performed to recognize the target. The results showed that, compared with P300 or SSVEP only features, the hybrid features significantly improved the accuracy. The subjects felt more comfortable for contrasts below 25%. The classification accuracy wouldn't have a great loss unless the contrast was below 12%. Taken together, the optimal contrast was 12% for the hybrid P300-SSVEP BCI system in this study.
混合P300-SSVEP脑机接口视觉舒适性和分类精度优化
近年来,视觉脑机接口(bci)在速度方面取得了很大的进步。但是,强闪光引起的视觉疲劳问题对设计长期使用的实用系统提出了巨大的挑战。降低刺激对比度是提高视觉舒适度的直接途径。但它也会削弱特征诱发电位,从而对系统精度带来负面影响。因此,如何找到既具有高视觉舒适度又具有高准确度的最佳对比度具有重要意义。本研究探讨了不同刺激对比对这两个方面的影响。6个P300-SSVEP杂交拼写者在不同的刺激对比下发育。三名受试者每人在离线状态下拼出10个相同的字符。在每次拼写之后,研究对象被要求根据视觉舒适度对他们刚刚看到的闪光进行评分。采用逐步线性判别分析(SWLDA)识别P300电位;采用带有单个模板的滤波器组典型相关分析(FBCCA)对SSVEP进行分类。采用决策融合对目标进行识别。结果表明,与P300或仅SSVEP特征相比,混合特征显著提高了准确率。当对比度低于25%时,受试者感觉更舒服。除非对比度低于12%,否则分类精度不会有很大的损失。综上所述,本研究中P300-SSVEP混合BCI系统的最佳对比度为12%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信