{"title":"Organic Carbon Burial in Constructed Ponds in Southern Sweden","authors":"K. Ljung, Simon Lin","doi":"10.3389/esss.2023.10061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small ponds constructed for nutrient retention, biodiversity conservation or recreation also store large amounts of carbon. The potential role of small ponds for carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions have been highlighted both in the scientific literature and in management plans. The role of small ponds in the global carbon budget is likely significant, but the potential has not been fully explored. Here we present measurements of yearly sedimentary carbon accumulation and carbon stocks in six small, constructed and restored ponds in southern Sweden. The ponds were constructed or restored during the last 20 years primarily for nutrient retention. The sediment cores span the time from the construction of the ponds until today. The ponds had high carbon accumulation, with mean total carbon stocks in the top 6 cm of sediment of 836 g C m−2 and a yearly mean C accumulation rate of 152 g C m−2 yr−1. The total amount of restored wetlands within the restoration program studied here has a total area of 480 ha, and upscaling the carbon stocks to the whole area of restored ponds and wetlands gave a total carbon stock of 4.013 × 106 kg C in the top 6 cm of the sediments. If considering the potential increase of CO2 and CH4 from the ponds it is likely that the constructed ponds studied here are net carbon sources. We compared our results with published measurements of CO2 and CH4 emissions from small ponds in Sweden. This shows that the CO2 equivalent emissions could be between 1.8 and 37.5 times higher than the sedimentary carbon accumulation. Our data indicate that small constructed ponds are potential net carbon sources. Therefore, we suggest that using small, constructed, or restored ponds as carbon mitigation strategy must be done with caution, and the potential for increased methane emissions must be considered.","PeriodicalId":148192,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science, Systems and Society","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science, Systems and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/esss.2023.10061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Small ponds constructed for nutrient retention, biodiversity conservation or recreation also store large amounts of carbon. The potential role of small ponds for carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions have been highlighted both in the scientific literature and in management plans. The role of small ponds in the global carbon budget is likely significant, but the potential has not been fully explored. Here we present measurements of yearly sedimentary carbon accumulation and carbon stocks in six small, constructed and restored ponds in southern Sweden. The ponds were constructed or restored during the last 20 years primarily for nutrient retention. The sediment cores span the time from the construction of the ponds until today. The ponds had high carbon accumulation, with mean total carbon stocks in the top 6 cm of sediment of 836 g C m−2 and a yearly mean C accumulation rate of 152 g C m−2 yr−1. The total amount of restored wetlands within the restoration program studied here has a total area of 480 ha, and upscaling the carbon stocks to the whole area of restored ponds and wetlands gave a total carbon stock of 4.013 × 106 kg C in the top 6 cm of the sediments. If considering the potential increase of CO2 and CH4 from the ponds it is likely that the constructed ponds studied here are net carbon sources. We compared our results with published measurements of CO2 and CH4 emissions from small ponds in Sweden. This shows that the CO2 equivalent emissions could be between 1.8 and 37.5 times higher than the sedimentary carbon accumulation. Our data indicate that small constructed ponds are potential net carbon sources. Therefore, we suggest that using small, constructed, or restored ponds as carbon mitigation strategy must be done with caution, and the potential for increased methane emissions must be considered.
为保留养分、保护生物多样性或娱乐而建造的小池塘也储存了大量的碳。在科学文献和管理计划中都强调了小池塘在碳储存和温室气体排放方面的潜在作用。小池塘在全球碳收支中的作用可能很重要,但其潜力尚未得到充分探索。在这里,我们介绍了在瑞典南部六个小型的、建造的和修复的池塘中每年沉积碳积累和碳储量的测量。这些池塘是在过去20年中建造或修复的,主要是为了保留养分。沉积物岩心跨越了从池塘建造到今天的时间。池塘碳积累量大,沉积物顶部6cm平均总碳储量为836 g C m−2,年平均碳积累速率为152 g C m−2 yr−1。研究区恢复湿地总面积为480 ha,将恢复池和湿地的碳储量放大到整个恢复池和湿地的面积,沉积物表层6 cm的碳储量为4.013 × 106 kg C。如果考虑到池塘中CO2和CH4的潜在增加,则这里研究的人工池塘很可能是净碳源。我们将我们的结果与发表的瑞典小池塘二氧化碳和甲烷排放的测量结果进行了比较。这表明CO2当量排放量可能比沉积碳积累量高1.8 ~ 37.5倍。我们的数据表明,小型人工池塘是潜在的净碳源。因此,我们建议必须谨慎使用小型、建造或修复的池塘作为碳减缓战略,并必须考虑增加甲烷排放的可能性。