The study of the formation processes and signs of the likelihood of vaccination in priority contingents in various epidemic diseases (sociological research)

E. A. Budnikova, O. Kubar, O. V. Iozefovich, S. Kharit
{"title":"The study of the formation processes and signs of the likelihood of vaccination in priority contingents in various epidemic diseases (sociological research)","authors":"E. A. Budnikova, O. Kubar, O. V. Iozefovich, S. Kharit","doi":"10.22625/2072-6732-2023-15-2-123-131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study: to determine the development of vaccination against infections associated with contingents in an epidemic crisis.Materials and methods: the method of a sociological survey of future workers and those vaccinated in different epidemic status periods was used: 2019 – the pre-pandemic period and 2020 – the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. A sociological survey was conducted in 2019 among 212 medical workers (130 doctors and 82 nurses) and among 229 medical workers in 2020 (143 doctors and 86 nurses). Parents were also interviewed using a questionnaire. 100 and 50 respondents took part in the survey, respectively.Results: a large number of pregnant workers – 74.3-88.1% are positive about vaccination. However, 6.8% of therapists and 9.6% of nurses of adult health facilities express a wary attitude, there were no negative reactions, unlike in 2019, when the severity of 2.2% of general practitioners and 4.2% of nurses of adult health facilities was negative. The largest number of respondents of all groups among the reasons for refusing to vaccinate is called “information that vaccinations are dangerous” from 76.6% to 88.9% in 20219, from 74.1% to 93.2% in 2020. Among parents, only 34% had a positive attitude towards vaccination, 12% negatively.Conclusions: It is necessary to take prompt measures to increase adherence to vaccination of the main social groups that have a decisive influence on the attitude and effect of vaccination.","PeriodicalId":226950,"journal":{"name":"Journal Infectology","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Infectology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22625/2072-6732-2023-15-2-123-131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study: to determine the development of vaccination against infections associated with contingents in an epidemic crisis.Materials and methods: the method of a sociological survey of future workers and those vaccinated in different epidemic status periods was used: 2019 – the pre-pandemic period and 2020 – the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. A sociological survey was conducted in 2019 among 212 medical workers (130 doctors and 82 nurses) and among 229 medical workers in 2020 (143 doctors and 86 nurses). Parents were also interviewed using a questionnaire. 100 and 50 respondents took part in the survey, respectively.Results: a large number of pregnant workers – 74.3-88.1% are positive about vaccination. However, 6.8% of therapists and 9.6% of nurses of adult health facilities express a wary attitude, there were no negative reactions, unlike in 2019, when the severity of 2.2% of general practitioners and 4.2% of nurses of adult health facilities was negative. The largest number of respondents of all groups among the reasons for refusing to vaccinate is called “information that vaccinations are dangerous” from 76.6% to 88.9% in 20219, from 74.1% to 93.2% in 2020. Among parents, only 34% had a positive attitude towards vaccination, 12% negatively.Conclusions: It is necessary to take prompt measures to increase adherence to vaccination of the main social groups that have a decisive influence on the attitude and effect of vaccination.
对各种流行病优先事件中接种疫苗可能性的形成过程和迹象的研究(社会学研究)
这项研究的目的是:确定在流行病危机中与意外事件有关的感染的疫苗接种的发展情况。材料和方法:采用社会学调查的方法,对不同流行状态时期的未来工作者和接种者进行调查:2019年-大流行前期和2020年- COVID-19大流行期。2019年对212名医务人员(130名医生、82名护士)进行社会学调查,2020年对229名医务人员(143名医生、86名护士)进行社会学调查。家长们也接受了问卷调查。分别有100名和50名受访者参与了调查。结果:74.3% ~ 88.1%的孕妇对疫苗接种有积极反应。然而,成人医疗机构中6.8%的治疗师和9.6%的护士表现出谨慎的态度,没有出现负面反应,这与2019年2.2%的全科医生和4.2%的成人医疗机构护士表现出负面反应不同。在拒绝接种疫苗的原因中,各群体中被调查者人数最多的是“接种疫苗危险的信息”,从20219年的76.6%上升到88.9%,从2020年的74.1%上升到93.2%。在家长中,只有34%的人对疫苗接种持积极态度,12%的人持消极态度。结论:应及时采取措施,提高对疫苗接种态度和效果有决定性影响的主要社会群体的疫苗接种依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信