M. Welzl, Safiqul Islam, Runa Barik, S. Gjessing, A. Elmokashfi
{"title":"Investigating the Delay Impact of the DiffServ Code Point (DSCP)","authors":"M. Welzl, Safiqul Islam, Runa Barik, S. Gjessing, A. Elmokashfi","doi":"10.1109/ICCNC.2019.8685538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The DiffServ Code Point (DSCP) field in the IP header allows to specify a desired per-hop behavior as packets traverse routers. Setting the DSCP field opportunistically, without prior contractual agreement, has recently become accepted practice for Internet end hosts. Measurement studies find that there is reason to hope for a DSCP setting to have an effect on traffic, and at least configuring this value is not heavily detrimental: systematic drops of packets due to non-zero DSCP values are rare, and the value is often left intact along an end-to-end path. What these studies do not discuss is whether per-hop behaviors truly are honored: what happens to packets in terms of the delay they experience? In this paper, we make an attempt to find a first answer to this by mining a dataset of our own recent large-scale measurement study. Using a deep neural network, we obtain the importance of the factors which help us understand the delay impact of the DSCP.","PeriodicalId":161815,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCNC.2019.8685538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
The DiffServ Code Point (DSCP) field in the IP header allows to specify a desired per-hop behavior as packets traverse routers. Setting the DSCP field opportunistically, without prior contractual agreement, has recently become accepted practice for Internet end hosts. Measurement studies find that there is reason to hope for a DSCP setting to have an effect on traffic, and at least configuring this value is not heavily detrimental: systematic drops of packets due to non-zero DSCP values are rare, and the value is often left intact along an end-to-end path. What these studies do not discuss is whether per-hop behaviors truly are honored: what happens to packets in terms of the delay they experience? In this paper, we make an attempt to find a first answer to this by mining a dataset of our own recent large-scale measurement study. Using a deep neural network, we obtain the importance of the factors which help us understand the delay impact of the DSCP.
IP报头中的DiffServ Code Point (DSCP)字段允许指定数据包经过路由器时所需的每跳行为。在没有事先合同协议的情况下,投机地设置DSCP字段最近已成为互联网终端主机的一种被接受的做法。测量研究发现,有理由希望DSCP设置对流量产生影响,并且至少配置该值不会造成严重损害:由于DSCP值非零而导致的系统数据包丢失很少,并且该值通常在端到端路径上保持不变。这些研究没有讨论的是,每跳行为是否真的得到了尊重:就它们所经历的延迟而言,数据包发生了什么?在本文中,我们试图通过挖掘我们自己最近大规模测量研究的数据集来找到这个问题的第一个答案。利用深度神经网络,我们得到了各因素的重要性,这有助于我们理解延迟scp的延迟影响。