Sustainability indicators in the agroforestry systems of family farmers in the district of Tomé-Açu, Pará

Elisana Batista Dos Santos, Osvaldo Ryohei Kato, Roberta De Fátima Rodrigues Coelho, Marinalva Cardoso Maciel
{"title":"Sustainability indicators in the agroforestry systems of family farmers in the district of Tomé-Açu, Pará","authors":"Elisana Batista Dos Santos, Osvaldo Ryohei Kato, Roberta De Fátima Rodrigues Coelho, Marinalva Cardoso Maciel","doi":"10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v16i0.7258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article was to evaluate, using sustainability indicators, agroforestry systems (AFS) on the properties of family farmers in the district of Tomé-Açu, Pará, arising from the transition processes of different production systems. Eight AFS, three areas of secondary vegetation, and three conventional systems were evaluated. Direct observation was used to evaluate the sustainability indicators, assigning a value from 1 to 10 to each indicator (1 - undesirable; 5 - moderate and 10 - ideal). The mean value of the indicators was determined for each system under evaluation. The areas under conventional systems had the lowest value, of 0.25 for the crop-health indicators and 1.32 for soil quality, which suggests the need for proper management to prevent environmental problems in areas of pasture, cleared land and monocropped black pepper. The highest values of 4.1 for the crop-health indicators and 6.99 for soil quality, were obtained in the areas of secondary vegetation, and values of 3.0 for crop health and 6.1 for soil quality in the areas of AFS-BP, emphasising the role of secondary vegetation and agroforestry systems in recovering the productive potential of agrosystems. It can be concluded that the use of a simple technique (radar charts) together with statistical methods show that secondary vegetation, agroforestry and conventional systems differ; however, secondary vegetation and AFS are more sustainable, as they showed better results for each of the indicators under evaluation compared to the conventional systems.","PeriodicalId":299264,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE","volume":"186 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v16i0.7258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article was to evaluate, using sustainability indicators, agroforestry systems (AFS) on the properties of family farmers in the district of Tomé-Açu, Pará, arising from the transition processes of different production systems. Eight AFS, three areas of secondary vegetation, and three conventional systems were evaluated. Direct observation was used to evaluate the sustainability indicators, assigning a value from 1 to 10 to each indicator (1 - undesirable; 5 - moderate and 10 - ideal). The mean value of the indicators was determined for each system under evaluation. The areas under conventional systems had the lowest value, of 0.25 for the crop-health indicators and 1.32 for soil quality, which suggests the need for proper management to prevent environmental problems in areas of pasture, cleared land and monocropped black pepper. The highest values of 4.1 for the crop-health indicators and 6.99 for soil quality, were obtained in the areas of secondary vegetation, and values of 3.0 for crop health and 6.1 for soil quality in the areas of AFS-BP, emphasising the role of secondary vegetation and agroforestry systems in recovering the productive potential of agrosystems. It can be concluded that the use of a simple technique (radar charts) together with statistical methods show that secondary vegetation, agroforestry and conventional systems differ; however, secondary vegetation and AFS are more sustainable, as they showed better results for each of the indicators under evaluation compared to the conventional systems.
帕尔托姆萨-阿帕拉苏地区家庭农民农林业系统的可持续性指标
本文的目的是利用可持续性指标,评价农林业系统(AFS)对帕尔托姆萨-阿帕拉苏地区不同生产系统过渡过程中产生的家庭农民的财产的影响。对8个AFS、3个次生植被区和3个常规系统进行了评价。采用直接观察来评价可持续性指标,为每个指标分配1到10的值(1 -不理想;5 -中等,10 -理想)。为每个待评价系统确定指标的平均值。在传统制度下的地区,作物健康指数为0.25,土壤质量指数为1.32,这表明需要适当的管理,以防止牧场、清场和单一种植黑胡椒地区的环境问题。次生植被区作物健康指数和土壤质量指数最高,分别为4.1和6.99,AFS-BP区作物健康指数和土壤质量指数分别为3.0和6.1,强调了次生植被和农林复合系统在恢复农业系统生产潜力方面的作用。可以得出的结论是,使用一种简单的技术(雷达图)和统计方法表明,次生植被、农林业和常规系统不同;然而,次生植被和AFS的可持续性更强,与传统系统相比,它们在每个指标上都表现出更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信