A typology of occupational teachers’ capacities across the three academic levels

S. Loo
{"title":"A typology of occupational teachers’ capacities across the three academic levels","authors":"S. Loo","doi":"10.4324/9780429505119-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on the pedagogic activities of teachers, who are involved in professional or work-related provisions. It uses a dual professionalism concept at the initial stage to investigate how teachers acquire and apply their teaching know-how or capacities from curriculum development to teaching strategies. The study of the acquisition of knowledge relies on concepts by Clandinin (1985), Shulman (1987), Becher (1994) and Bernstein (1996). The understanding of the application of know-how refers to theories by Eraut (2004), Evans et al. (2010), Loo (2014) and Winch (2014). In particular, recontextualisation processes are used to understand the acquisition and application of the teachers’ capacities. In so doing, a list of contextual activities is ascertained from the various recontextualisation processes. These activities are derived from the teachers’ pedagogic activities across three academic levels and varied disciplines. Thus this chapter offers development of these analysed descriptive narratives and metaphors culminating in a typology of these teaching activities. \n \nThe empirical data is from a project (Loo, 2018) which investigates the types of teaching and learning using forms of recontextualisation to understand how certain kinds of knowledge such as occupational, disciplinary and pedagogic are acquired and applied in teaching contexts. The participants teach on pre-university or technical and vocational education and training (TVET), first-degree or higher vocational and professional education. The disciplines of these teachers include gas fitting, equine studies, fashion and textiles and airline studies at the TVET level, dental hygiene and accountancy at the higher vocational level, and the training of doctors and Emergency Medicine clinicians at the professional level. There are 21 participants in total with seven from each of the three academic levels. The empirical data is drawn from a questionnaire survey and semi-structured interviews and supporting documents such as curriculum specifications. \n \nThe findings from the analysed empirical data offer insights into how the teachers acquire and apply their pedagogic and professional know-how. Occupational knowledge refers to the teachers’ professional practices in their disciplines such as airline studies and accountancy, which are used in their teaching practices. The findings also provide additional insights into how the teachers’ capacities/know-how are selected and relocated – recontextualised – for use in the different teaching contexts and technical provisions that they deliver. In so doing, these activities offer a typology of the different recontextualisation processes about the teaching activities at the three academic levels. This typology, drawing from the different classifications of the literature review and analysed empirical data, contributes to a greater understanding of how teachers with professional practices rely on and apply their pedagogic and professional experiences to facilitate their teaching of work-related programmes. It offers different forms of disciplinary knowledge that the teachers refer to and how they make it relevant to their particular discipline. Additionally, the typology points to the symbiotic relationship between teaching and professional practices, the reliance on real-life experiences as well as the appropriate teaching strategies that are employed in education. The findings have implications for occupational teachers, managers of work-related provisions, teacher educators and policymakers.","PeriodicalId":153473,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Dimensions of Teaching and Learning for Occupational Practice","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Dimensions of Teaching and Learning for Occupational Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505119-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the pedagogic activities of teachers, who are involved in professional or work-related provisions. It uses a dual professionalism concept at the initial stage to investigate how teachers acquire and apply their teaching know-how or capacities from curriculum development to teaching strategies. The study of the acquisition of knowledge relies on concepts by Clandinin (1985), Shulman (1987), Becher (1994) and Bernstein (1996). The understanding of the application of know-how refers to theories by Eraut (2004), Evans et al. (2010), Loo (2014) and Winch (2014). In particular, recontextualisation processes are used to understand the acquisition and application of the teachers’ capacities. In so doing, a list of contextual activities is ascertained from the various recontextualisation processes. These activities are derived from the teachers’ pedagogic activities across three academic levels and varied disciplines. Thus this chapter offers development of these analysed descriptive narratives and metaphors culminating in a typology of these teaching activities. The empirical data is from a project (Loo, 2018) which investigates the types of teaching and learning using forms of recontextualisation to understand how certain kinds of knowledge such as occupational, disciplinary and pedagogic are acquired and applied in teaching contexts. The participants teach on pre-university or technical and vocational education and training (TVET), first-degree or higher vocational and professional education. The disciplines of these teachers include gas fitting, equine studies, fashion and textiles and airline studies at the TVET level, dental hygiene and accountancy at the higher vocational level, and the training of doctors and Emergency Medicine clinicians at the professional level. There are 21 participants in total with seven from each of the three academic levels. The empirical data is drawn from a questionnaire survey and semi-structured interviews and supporting documents such as curriculum specifications. The findings from the analysed empirical data offer insights into how the teachers acquire and apply their pedagogic and professional know-how. Occupational knowledge refers to the teachers’ professional practices in their disciplines such as airline studies and accountancy, which are used in their teaching practices. The findings also provide additional insights into how the teachers’ capacities/know-how are selected and relocated – recontextualised – for use in the different teaching contexts and technical provisions that they deliver. In so doing, these activities offer a typology of the different recontextualisation processes about the teaching activities at the three academic levels. This typology, drawing from the different classifications of the literature review and analysed empirical data, contributes to a greater understanding of how teachers with professional practices rely on and apply their pedagogic and professional experiences to facilitate their teaching of work-related programmes. It offers different forms of disciplinary knowledge that the teachers refer to and how they make it relevant to their particular discipline. Additionally, the typology points to the symbiotic relationship between teaching and professional practices, the reliance on real-life experiences as well as the appropriate teaching strategies that are employed in education. The findings have implications for occupational teachers, managers of work-related provisions, teacher educators and policymakers.
职业教师在三个学术水平上的能力类型
本章着重于教师的教学活动,他们参与专业或工作相关的规定。它在初始阶段使用双重专业概念来调查教师如何获取和应用他们从课程开发到教学策略的教学知识或能力。关于知识获取的研究依赖于Clandinin (1985), Shulman (1987), Becher(1994)和Bernstein(1996)的概念。对技术诀窍应用的理解参考了Eraut(2004)、Evans等人(2010)、Loo(2014)和Winch(2014)的理论。特别是,重新语境化过程被用来理解教师能力的获取和应用。这样,从各种再语境化过程中确定了一系列情境活动。这些活动来源于教师在三个学术水平和不同学科的教学活动。因此,本章提供了这些分析的描述性叙述和隐喻的发展,最终形成了这些教学活动的类型学。经验数据来自一个项目(Loo, 2018),该项目使用重新情境化的形式调查了教学和学习的类型,以了解如何在教学环境中获取和应用某些类型的知识,如职业知识、学科知识和教学知识。参与者在大学预科或技术和职业教育与培训(TVET),第一学位或更高的职业和专业教育中任教。这些教师的学科包括职业技术教育水平的燃气安装、马匹研究、时尚和纺织品和航空研究,高等职业水平的牙科卫生和会计,以及专业水平的医生和急诊医学临床医生培训。共有21名参与者,三个学术级别各7名。实证数据来自问卷调查和半结构化访谈以及课程规范等支持文件。从分析的实证数据的发现提供了对教师如何获取和应用他们的教学和专业知识的见解。职业知识是指教师在其学科领域的专业实践,如航空学、会计学等,用于教学实践。调查结果还提供了更多的见解,说明如何选择和重新定位教师的能力/知识,以便在他们提供的不同教学环境和技术条款中使用。通过这样做,这些活动提供了三个学术水平的教学活动的不同重新语境化过程的类型学。从文献综述的不同分类和分析的经验数据中得出的这种类型有助于更好地理解具有专业实践的教师如何依赖和应用他们的教学和专业经验来促进与工作相关的课程的教学。它提供了教师所引用的不同形式的学科知识,以及他们如何使其与他们的特定学科相关。此外,类型学指出了教学与专业实践之间的共生关系,对现实生活经验的依赖以及在教育中采用的适当教学策略。研究结果对职业教师、与工作相关的规定管理人员、教师教育者和政策制定者具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信