Self Help, Sunlight and a Modern Chair: Considering Auckland’s historic signage as a heritage object

C. Powley
{"title":"Self Help, Sunlight and a Modern Chair: Considering Auckland’s historic signage as a heritage object","authors":"C. Powley","doi":"10.24135/backstory.vi8.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cities are an ever-changing space, filled with commerce and community. Signage plays a strong role in the visual narrative of the urban environment. It creates a constant visual hum, a street level monologue of promotion, identification and direction. Commercial signs are designed to serve and improve business. So, what role could an old, fading or non-functioning piece of signage possibly play in our neoliberal capitalist society? From a designer’s perspective, there’s a lot to like—the craftsmanship, the idiosyncrasies of a hand-generated pieceof typography, the sense of nostalgia for a time before globalisation and brand guidelines took over. Looking at historic signs from a broader context they also represent an “intricate urban history.”1 They speak of the changing face of commercial enterprise, social values and cultural expression. Even when they no longer serve their original semantic role of commercial promotion, they “accumulate rich layers of meaning. They no longer merely advertise, they are valued in and of themselves. They become icons.”2 The semiotic function of an historic sign shifts to a new role—signifying notions of survival, continuity and loss. They also feed into our complex personal narratives of place, identity and community.3 These multiple and interwoven values can form the cultural significance of historic signs. Despite this recognisable value, historic signage tends to fall through the gaps of heritage practice and legislation in New Zealand. This paper offers a set of case studies that represent a range of possible outcomes for historic signs, when they exist outside a system of heritage management. I propose six categories for framing the case studies: remain, repair, regenerate, relocate, replace and remove. These examples are combined with a broader reflection on the value of historic signage and an overview of relevant heritage practice in New Zealand. The intention is to encourage reflection on the possible heritage significance of historic signage and our current approach to assessment, scheduling and conservation.","PeriodicalId":223199,"journal":{"name":"Back Story Journal of New Zealand Art, Media & Design History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Back Story Journal of New Zealand Art, Media & Design History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/backstory.vi8.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities are an ever-changing space, filled with commerce and community. Signage plays a strong role in the visual narrative of the urban environment. It creates a constant visual hum, a street level monologue of promotion, identification and direction. Commercial signs are designed to serve and improve business. So, what role could an old, fading or non-functioning piece of signage possibly play in our neoliberal capitalist society? From a designer’s perspective, there’s a lot to like—the craftsmanship, the idiosyncrasies of a hand-generated pieceof typography, the sense of nostalgia for a time before globalisation and brand guidelines took over. Looking at historic signs from a broader context they also represent an “intricate urban history.”1 They speak of the changing face of commercial enterprise, social values and cultural expression. Even when they no longer serve their original semantic role of commercial promotion, they “accumulate rich layers of meaning. They no longer merely advertise, they are valued in and of themselves. They become icons.”2 The semiotic function of an historic sign shifts to a new role—signifying notions of survival, continuity and loss. They also feed into our complex personal narratives of place, identity and community.3 These multiple and interwoven values can form the cultural significance of historic signs. Despite this recognisable value, historic signage tends to fall through the gaps of heritage practice and legislation in New Zealand. This paper offers a set of case studies that represent a range of possible outcomes for historic signs, when they exist outside a system of heritage management. I propose six categories for framing the case studies: remain, repair, regenerate, relocate, replace and remove. These examples are combined with a broader reflection on the value of historic signage and an overview of relevant heritage practice in New Zealand. The intention is to encourage reflection on the possible heritage significance of historic signage and our current approach to assessment, scheduling and conservation.
自助,阳光和现代椅子:奥克兰的历史标志作为遗产对象
城市是一个不断变化的空间,充满了商业和社区。标识在城市环境的视觉叙事中扮演着重要的角色。它创造了一种持续的视觉嗡嗡声,一种宣传、识别和方向的街头独白。商业标志的设计是为了服务和促进商业。那么,在我们这个新自由主义的资本主义社会里,一块老旧的、褪色的或不起作用的标牌可能扮演什么角色呢?从设计师的角度来看,有很多东西值得喜欢——工艺、手工排版的特质、对全球化和品牌指导方针占据主导地位之前的怀旧感。从更广泛的背景来看历史标志,它们也代表了“复杂的城市历史”。他们谈到了商业企业、社会价值和文化表现形式的变化。即使它们不再服务于商业推广的原始语义作用,它们也“积累了丰富的意义层次”。它们不再仅仅是广告,它们本身就有价值。他们成为了偶像。历史符号的符号学功能转向了一个新的角色——象征生存、延续和丧失的概念。它们也为我们复杂的关于地方、身份和社区的个人叙述提供素材这些多重的、相互交织的价值构成了历史标志的文化意义。尽管具有这种可识别的价值,但历史标志往往会在新西兰的遗产实践和立法中落伍。本文提供了一组案例研究,它们代表了历史标志存在于遗产管理系统之外的一系列可能的结果。我建议将案例研究分为六个类别:保留、修复、再生、重新安置、替换和移除。这些例子结合了对历史标志价值的更广泛反思和新西兰相关遗产实践的概述。其目的是鼓励人们反思历史标志可能的遗产意义,以及我们目前的评估、规划和保护方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信